September 11, 2009

Out of Office: AutoReply

If all goes according to plan, at some point today I'll be standing on top of this:


Presumably without quite as much snow this time, I hope. I'll post an update as soon as possible afterward, with a full report to follow next week sometime.

Read more...

September 9, 2009

The Barefoot Files: Training Update #3

"Easy, then light, then smooth, then fast. Take care of the first three, and fast will take care of itself."

- Caballo Blanco (pictured), from Born to Run by Christopher McDougall


One indication that your life has taken a turn for the crazy might be when you start considering mantras from a quirky, mysterious, middle-aged vagabond to be some kind of universal wisdom.

Nevertheless, that’s exactly what’s become of me over the past few weeks as I try to settle into a comfortable routine as a barefoot runner. While some parts are falling into place quite nicely, there are other aspects that I continually struggle against – although I think I might have had a minor breakthrough in that regard, as Ill explain shortly.

With that, let’s get to the details. (I’m trying to keep these reports shorter, I promise.) If you missed them, update #1 is here, and update #2 is here.


Week 6: 4 barefoot runs, 2 Vibram Five Fingers (VFF) runs

Barefoot:
• 30 min on asphalt
• 20 min on all-weather track
• 10 min on dirt
• 10 min on asphalt

Vibram Five Fingers (VFF):
• 60 min on trail
• 65 min on trail

The 30-minute road run represents the longest duration I have gone without shoes, and also the first time that I walked out the door solely to do a barefoot run. That is, I didn’t tack these minutes onto the end of a longer shod run; the entire workout was 30 minutes long. Kind of sad for an ultrarunner. Even more depressing was the fact that I probably only covered about 2 miles – more on that issue in a second.

I figured I’d try running on the track one day, thinking that its springiness would be a comfortable departure from the hard asphalt. It was, and it wasn’t. The impact of the track was very minimal, but the rough texture of the all-weather surface was the perfect formula for creating friction blisters on my toes. I cut this workout short just as I started feeling some hot spots.

Resting in the meadow

Dirt surfaces weren’t much of a relief, either. Remember the quaint little meadow I wrote about recently? I run on the dirt paths there sometimes – and if I’m not tormented by sticks and pebbles and acorn shells, I’m wincing from the little thorns dispersed from the recently mowed wild grass. It’s amazing how such tiny little things can cause such immense discomfort sometimes.

On the plus side, one nice development has been my rapid progression and easy tolerance of using the Vibram FiveFingers. Aside from the traction issues on steep downhills that I mentioned in my KSO review, I feel very confident tackling any kind of terrain with them, and I don’t seem to suffer any strange aches or soreness afterwards. They’re the only means by which I can get any decent mileage on trails right now.

In fact, I felt comfortable enough to debut the VFFs on a group outing, at our weekly 6-mile hilly trail run. My overall time was a few minutes slower than normal, but I kept up well enough that the rest of the group didn’t have to wait for me more than a couple of minutes at the bottom of some long descents - or maybe they were just being polite to the freak who showed up wearing gorilla feet. It’s sometimes tough to tell.

Hitting the trails in VFF


Week 7: 5 barefoot runs, 2 VFF runs

Barefoot:
• 20 min asphalt
• 12 min asphalt
• 6 min dirt
• 24 min asphalt
• 15 min asphalt

VFF:
• 55 min trail
• 65 min trail

My VFF mileage stayed pretty consistent this week, mainly because I didn’t have enough training time to push further. That will come soon enough.

The primary revelation from this week has been a mental shift in my approach to running barefoot on asphalt - and that’s where I’m starting to channel my inner Caballo Blanco.

From the very beginning of this experiment, my biggest frustration has been how excruciatingly slow you have to go when starting out barefoot. On most of my road runs, I’ve tried to push the pace as soon as I felt capable of it, only to develop some strange (and usually sharp) pain as a result. My form would falter a bit right as I tried to speed up, and I could feel the difference in my foot strike immediately. More often than not, my barefoot road runs would end with me nursing one sore spot or another that developed due to my impatience.

Finally, in the midst of struggling down one particularly rough stretch of road and feeling down on myself, I recalled the quote that introduced this post, and decided to check myself before I wrecked myself. I basically thought, “Screw it – just run the right way, as easy as you need to in order to make it more comfortable, no matter how slowly you’re moving or how ridiculous you look.” I shortened my stride to near baby steps, and slowed my pace down remarkably close to walking.

It sounds surreal – but just a few moments later, the asphalt became much more tolerable. (I warned you that this stuff could turn crazy.)

At one with the road ... seriously

I came to realize that I’ve been battling the asphalt all this time, when I should really be trying to work with it instead. So during my last two runs of the week, I did exactly that: I ran as easy as possible, taking only what the road gave me without striving for anything more, and disregarding any expectation of speed or distance. That mental shift made a world of difference; now instead of finishing workouts in pain, I’ve completed the last couple of workouts feeling like I could keep right on going if I had the time to do so.

In other words, I think I’ve got easy down now. I’m working on light (not exactly my specialty), then I guess I’ll need to figure out smooth (whatever that means) somehow before I begin to worry about fast anymore. I don’t know if I’ll ever get there, but at least the long journey won’t be quite so painful anymore.

Read more...

September 8, 2009

Nike Free Everyday+ 2 Shoe Review

"I'm running free, yeah ...

I'm running free."
- Iron Maiden, "Running Free" (video after post)

*Admin note: It was virtually impossible for me to review a running shoe called the Free and NOT think of that classic Maiden song. If you're a hard rock fan of a certain age, you've already got the chorus stuck in your head just by reading it. For the rest of you, the video follows the post.

**
Just about every runner has a Nike story.

The company has been so ubiquitous in the development and expansion of the sport of running that you’d be hard pressed to find someone who has never worn Nike shoes. They are the 800-lb gorilla that every other shoe company must contend with, and they’re a force of nature within the running community.

Given their size, Nike also makes an easy target for criticism, some of which has become high-profile over the years. In the 1990s, the company was widely criticized for human rights concerns within its Asian workforce (an especially interesting point for me, in light of this recent post), and for environmental negligence. While some of those concerns (especially the labor ones) have persisted into the 21st Century, Nike has done a respectable job of cleaning up its act when it comes to social responsibility.

For example, the environmental organization Clean Air-Cool Planet ranks Nike third among 56 companies for its climate-friendly business practices. Nike has also created innovative products such as the Trash Talk shoe, constructed from materials gathered from the factory floor during manufacturing. Perhaps their most successful initiative, from a community and environmental standpoint, is the Reuse-A-Shoe program, which recycles old running shoes whose materials are then used for basketball courts, running tracks, and playground surfaces.

So while the company may not be perfect, they’re certainly making strides in the right direction. And through all the controversy and reform efforts, their shoes have continued to sell like crazy, indicating the mighty influence Nike still wields among shoe consumers. Therefore, when Nike trends in any particular direction, the entire industry takes notice.

In many regards, that’s exactly what’s happened with the whole barefoot renaissance that’s taking place. I’ve already written about how the company who more or less invented the modern running shoe has also been at the forefront of the barefoot movement, but it bears emphasizing how large a role Nike played in the development of it all.

It was Nike who listened to feedback from its sponsored coaches (most notably Vin Lananna at Stanford) and athletes who found improved comfort and performance while running barefoot. It was Nike who spent millions on research to develop footwear that allows the foot and ankle to function naturally in the framework of a traditional running shoe. And it was Nike who promoted the benefits of barefoot running to mass consumer markets. It’s impossible to prove - but if a smaller, niche company had come out with a “barefoot running shoe” several years ago, chances are it would have been roundly ignored or ridiculed by the rest of the industry; since Nike did it, every other company was forced to respond.

Can your shoe do this?

Before we get to this specific shoe, I’ll try to clear up some confusion in regards to Nike terminology. The original Nike Free series that debuted in 2005 now has several versions on the market, classified by numbers like 3.0 and 5.0. The scale reflects “degrees of freedom”, or how closely the shoe mimics barefoot running. 10.0 would be a standard running shoe, and 0.0 would be running barefoot (or in purely minimal footwear like Vibram FiveFingers).

Since the transition to a more barefoot pattern can be problematic, some runners found it difficult to train in Nike Frees on a daily basis; that’s where the Free Everyday+ comes in. With this shoe, Nike attempts to combine the feeling of natural movement, but maintain the cushioning and support of an everyday trainer. It’s a neutral cushioned shoe that would sit somewhere in the upper half of Nike’s numeric scale. The Everyday+ 2 is the second generation of this particular series.

The Free series’ biggest departure from standard running shoes is in its flexibility. The midsole - and a good portion of the outsole - is made of Phylite material that is very lightweight and pliable, while the bottom of the shoe features deep flex grooves (both lateral and horizontal) to allow motion in all directions. The composite rubber outsole is highly durable and provides adequate traction for any kind of road running.

Groovy!

Given that the Free Everyday+ 2 is a transitional shoe as opposed to a true barefoot trainer, there are still several comfort features that Nike retains from its traditional running models. There is a soft midfoot saddle that wraps around the rearfoot for a secure fit, a molded sockliner matching the curvature of the foot for comfort and support, and a segmented crash pad in the midsole for shock absorption. There’s also a Nike Zoom unit in the heel for added cushioning; this is the only model in the Free series to feature air cushioning in the heel. These features don’t add significant bulk, however, as the entire shoe weighs in at a fairly lightweight 9.9 oz.

Upstairs, I was pleasantly surprised by both the form and function of the shoe’s upper. From a design standpoint, it’s got a serious old-school vibe to it, like a throwback to the days of the waffle trainer. It also has some smart features from a performance standpoint, such as a large forefoot area to allow natural foot movement, and an extremely breathable mesh for ventilation and comfort.

Old-school cool

If you’re wondering what the “plus” means in the name Free Everyday+ 2, it indicates that the shoe is compatible with Nike’s sensor technology – another feature that is missing from the rest of the Free series. Nike+ allows runners to measure and monitor their progress in conjunction with separate equipment such as the Nike+ SportBand, Nike+ iPod sport kit, or Nike+ iPhone 3GS. It’s pretty cool gadgetry to play around with, if you’re into that sort of thing. Since I tend to gravitate towards low-tech applications (have I mentioned that I like running barefoot?), I didn’t spend a lot of time with this feature to test its accuracy or reliability.

I have, however, put a lot of miles on these shoes since I received them a couple of months ago. They’ve been a great accompaniment to the barefoot mileage I’m running; on days when my ankles were feeling a little sore, or my feet were still too raw from asphalt friction to go barefoot again, I’d put 8 to 10 miles at a time on these shoes very comfortably.

It seems like Nike hit pretty close to the intended target with the Free Everyday+ 2: it’s a comfortable, durable trainer that would be a good transition shoe towards barefoot running, or a good alternative for barefoot runners who want to maintain a higher weekly mileage while giving their feet time to recuperate between barefoot workouts.

The Nike Free Everyday+ 2 sells for $92 from the Nike Store as well as various online retailers.

**
Iron Maiden, "Running Free" (click to play):



See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you’d like reviewed, contact me at info@runningandrambling.com.

Read more...

September 7, 2009

Oak Tree Meadow

Approximately halfway through my routine 6-mile neighborhood run, I circle the perimeter of a local meadow. It’s about two acres in size, and I’ve probably run around it about 500 times without giving much thought to spending any length of time there.

That was before I had a 5-year-old daughter.

One day last spring, our family took a walk through the meadow, and our youngest daughter discovered her own little nirvana: a lonely rope swing hanging from a branch of the largest oak tree. The meadow is now one of her favorite destinations whenever we have free time, and one of my favorite spots to take her when she needs some independent attention away from her brother and sister.

When I’m there with her, I find myself considering the meadow through a 5-year-old’s eyes, and feel a profound appreciation for this little Carmel Valley oasis.

The oak which holds the swing is enormous, and looks like something straight out of a storybook. It’s somewhere between 200 and 300 years old; it’s undoubtedly had thousands of kids climbing its branches over the decades.


Its trunk is thicker than any oak tree I’ve seen in the valley, with twisting and curving branches that surpass the size of many independent trees in the area. The base of the tree is so sheltered and quiet, it’s exactly the kind of spot where someone like Rip van Winkle could fall asleep for about 20 years.


One medium-sized branch holds the rope swing, but there’s usually a bit of tree climbing to be done before my daughter takes to the swing.


Some of the branches reach more than 40 feet horizontally from the trunk, but somehow manage to keep their mass above ground. However, they slope down low enough that an ambitious kid can pull herself aboard – as you’ll notice my daughter demonstrating with her legs sticking out on the left of this picture.


Thankfully, the branch is still strong enough to support an ambitious grown-up tree climber as well.


Several dirt paths meander through the meadow, which have become my daughter’s favorite trails to practice her bike riding. I’ve also found them a somewhat convenient place to practice barefoot running, but that’s for a separate post someday.

On this particular afternoon, after watching me take pictures for a while, my daughter commandeered the camera to snap some photos of her own, so the rest of the post is thanks to her.


She kind of surprised me, in that she actually has a decent eye for framing a photo; I like the artsy way she caught her bike in the shadow of the tree trunk here.


The inevitable “Now YOU get on the swing, Daddy!” picture. Pretty hard to say no to that one.

The next picture deserves some setup, which will be explained by the following conversation we had just beforehand:

Her: Dad … why do you take pictures of your feet so much?

Me: I’ve been telling some people about running barefoot, and sometimes I put pictures of my feet on the computer to show them I’m really doing it.

Her: I want to take a picture of my foot with yours, too.

Me: OK, go ahead.


So there you go.

I’ve decided that it’s kind of cool to see pictures from the eyes of a child; even better is to see the whole world – whether it’s an oak tree, a sunny meadow, a simple rope swing, or anything else we encounter - from that perspective as well. Outings like this always make me wish that my daughter and I can do this sort of thing more often.


Read more...

September 4, 2009

What's Done In Our Name

"No longer can we assume the Earth's resources are limitless; that there are ranges of unclimbed peaks extending endlessly beyond the horizon. Mountains are finite, and despite their massive appearance, they are fragile."
- Yvon Chouinard, Patagonia company founder

*
Given the amount of scandal and corruption in the corporate world over the past few years, I find it very refreshing to be pleasantly surprised by an American company every now and then.

Half of my enjoyment in doing product reviews – which hopefully shows through in the published posts - is educating myself in the histories and corporate philosophies of the companies whose gear I’m testing. I love learning about how certain visionary people can shape the spirit and work ethic of an entire business around them, how humble operations with shoestring budgets eventually grow into industry heavyweights, and how a company’s origins are almost always reflected in their product offerings, no matter how large or multifaceted the enterprise becomes.

And with increasing frequency, I’m very interested to hear about a company’s sense of social responsibility.


I mentioned in my review of the Release shoe that Patagonia is a socially responsible business, but that description doesn’t nearly do justice to the extent of their commitment to a multitude of environmental, ecological, and human rights causes - or to how impressed I was as I continued to gather information. They contribute a staggering amount of money (more than $25 million thus far) to a wide range of programs, and they have a core belief that business and technology should inspire solutions to global crises rather than worsen them. It's the kind of story that makes you feel continually better the more you hear about it.

Unfortunately, it often seems that some companies today consider themselves eco-friendly if they have a recycling bin in the break room. Others proclaim social awareness simply as a trendy marketing tagline, or consider it a necessary burden of doing business in the public eye in the 21st Century. Patagonia, on the other hand, preaches responsible business practices with a missionary’s zeal, and keeps it as the primary tenet of virtually all their business decisions. (It’s always been this way for them; the above quote from company founder Chouinard was from 1974.)

Most importantly, they also turn the microscope upon themselves - which is where today’s video clip comes in. It’s the first of a 3-part series produced by Patagonia, which investigates the vast complexities and concerns that must be considered in today’s global marketplace. Company executives as well as representatives from various environmental and human rights groups also discuss how every consumer – even those of us half a world away – has an impact on the survival of those programs and initiatives.

Sometimes it’s hard to comprehend how our individual purchasing decisions influence the practices of large companies, but this clip helps put that issue in to a sharper focus. It also suggests a question regarding personal ethics: namely, whether we value social responsibility enough to pay a little bit extra at the cash register (or, more likely, in the online checkout cart - but you get the idea) in support of companies who actually practice them faithfully.

In my Release review, I made an offhand remark about Patagonia’s reputation for having expensive products; clearly, the issue is far more complicated than that. Is it better to buy a $100 pair of shoes from a responsible company, or an $80 pair from a company with a lesser (or perhaps just a lesser-known) commitment? It’s never an easy decision to make, and in the current economy, the choice is probably a larger dilemma than it’s ever been for consumers. I’m not saying you’re morally obligated to spend more money every time you go shopping - but more and more lately, I’m thinking there should at least be some kind of internal discussion on the subject before you hand over your hard-earned dollars.

So that’s my little soapbox speech for the weekend. Watch the video and consider all the factors for yourself. One final note: the video is lengthy – clocking in at almost 16 minutes – but since it’s a holiday weekend, I’m hopeful that you can spare enough time for it.

*
The Footprint Chronicles: “What’s Done In Our Name” (click to play):

Read more...

September 2, 2009

Natural, Minimal ... or Plain Ol' Naked?

As a general rule, even the most dedicated barefoot runners aren’t completely barefoot people. Most of them aren’t even completely barefoot runners.

Alluring as the idea of living every single moment of our lives barefoot and carefree might be, life in the modern world is a far different reality. We have jobs, or go to churches, or attend formal gatherings where showing up barefoot is considered inappropriate. We eat in restaurants or shop in stores that have strict policies requiring footwear. Or we live in climates where exposing our toes to cold winter weather puts us at risk of frostbite.

Runners who embrace the concept face even more challenges and potential problems; although we extol the virtues of barefoot running, the process isn’t nearly as simple as just throwing away your shoes. You have to build up a tolerance of the activity very slowly, and there are about 100 different ways to injure yourself by progressing recklessly. And even if you do everything correctly and become a proficient barefoot runner, there will still be occasions when you would rather have something on your feet for the sake of comfort or protection.

In other words, even the most hardcore barefoot runners wear something on their feet sometimes, either while running or in everyday life. (It’s worth noting that for all the mystique of the Tarahumara runners who helped inspire the recent barefoot craze, even they strap on a thin rubber outsole for most of their running.) So it would be great if there were some sort of compromise: footwear that allows the foot to function as if it’s still bare, while providing just enough fashion and/or insulation on top for us to assimilate with the rest of society.

Five or ten years ago, our best option would have been a thin pair of flip-flops, which aren’t exactly the height of either formality or warmth. Fortunately, the landscape is different today, with several companies offering exactly the type of products that barefoot practitioners are looking for. The growth of this market has drawn an interesting mix of companies into competition with each other; some are longstanding industry giants, others are small family-owned enterprises. Some of the giants have created small offshoot companies specifically for the barefoot market, and some of the tiny family businesses have grown into major players.

Additional factors complicate the mixture even further: there are actually two separate categories of footwear aimed at the barefoot consumer; one is referred to as “minimalist”, and the other is called “natural” or “transitional” footwear. Sometimes the companies who make minimalist shoes refer to them as “natural footwear”, and most of the companies who make natural footwear call them “barefoot” shoes. Confused yet?

So what’s the difference between minimalist footwear and natural footwear? Who are the major players in the industry? Which kind should you use? That’s why I’m here to help. The following information will give you a basic overview, and I’ll have specific reviews of all of these products in the weeks to come.


Minimalist footwear

As you might guess, minimalist footwear means just what the name implies: the absolute minimal covering you can get by with short of leaving your feet naked. Typically, the underside of this style of shoe is very thin and flexible, made of some kind of fabricated (and usually puncture-resistant) rubber just a few millimeters thick. There’s no heel, no midfoot cushioning, no arch support, and nothing to give the shoes structure; in fact, most shoes of this variety can be rolled upon themselves like a sleeping bag.

There’s a lot of variation in this category of footwear, however, with some models designed for running, and others for everyday use. Some of the more prominent players are:

Vivo Barefoot: A small subdivision of Terra Plana, which is itself an eco-friendly offshoot of the very successful Clark brand footwear. They emphasize socially responsible manufacturing and have the most extensive product line among minimalist shoemakers. Some of their styles are formal enough to be worn to church or at the office, while others are perfect for casual get-togethers. They don’t have a running-specific model yet, but are developing a line of performance shoes scheduled for release in spring of 2010.

Vibram: I won’t take up much space with this, as I’ve already written extensively about Vibram. They’re a good example of a family business that hit the big time, and the FiveFingers is the industry standard for minimalist footwear for runners.

Feelmax: This small Finnish company is just beginning to make inroads among American consumers. Their styles have a casual athletic-shoe look to them, including one model (the Osma, pictured) that could easily pass as a traditional running shoe. Like a good pair of sneakers, they can be used for exercise or casual wear.

Feelmax Osma

Feelmax went above and beyond the call of product reviews, providing me two different shoe models - the Niesa in addition to the Osma - and two pairs of socks. And since I’ve really liked their products so far, I’ll just get this joke out of my system now so I’m not tempted to say it during one of their review posts: Feelmax sounds like the name of a condom company to me.

(There, I feel much better. We can move on now.)

Soft Star: A classic Mom-and-Pop business from the Pacific Northwest who have been making moccasin-style footwear for 20 years, and found themselves sucked into the barefoot vortex thanks to their philosophy of allowing the foot to function naturally. Although their moccasins were originally intended for casual indoor/outdoor use, many barefooters have used them for running, especially in cold climates.

Sanuk: There's absolutely nothing dressy or performance-oriented about these shoes. Sanuks are made for one simple reason: to make you feel like you're just chillin' at the beach. They channel your inner hippie/surfer soul while allowing your feet to tread upon the Earth naturally, dude. I figured that any brand whose name translates to "happiness" was worth a closer look.


Natural footwear

Natural footwear is the terminology most commonly used to describe traditional shoes that have been modified to more closely replicate the biomechanics of the bare foot, while still providing most aspects of normal shoe construction (like cushioning) that consumers have come to expect.

It’s this category of footwear that has attracted the heavy hitters of the shoe industry, although it must be a kind of balancing act for many of them. Think of it this way: if you’re a shoe company, it doesn’t make much business sense to tell people they’d be better off barefoot. Nor does it help your credibility if you say that all those years of technological innovation really haven’t helped decrease injury rates or improve performance very much.

Consequently, the companies have entered this category in search of two primary groups of runners:

1) Those who regularly run barefoot or minimalist, but on some days would prefer a traditional shoe that enables them to maintain the biomechanics of barefoot running.
2) Those who have used traditional running shoes for years, and want to progress towards barefoot running gradually. For this reason, you’ll sometimes hear this category described as “transitional” footwear.

That last group is particularly important, given the tendency of new barefoot runners to get injured by doing too much too soon, when their legs aren’t ready to make such rapid and dramatic adaptations to the barefoot running form. Compared to traditional running shoes, natural footwear has a lower heel angle, less midfoot cushioning, and more forefoot flexibility. They represent a great intermediate step for someone looking to safely shift towards minimalist or barefoot running.

With that in mind, here are some key players:

Nike: You’ve heard of this company, right? They’re a little hole-in-the-wall outfit from someplace in Oregon, I think. Nike has actually been experimenting with the “barefoot shoe” concept for more than 15 years, beginning with the Air Huarache shoes of the early 1990s. It’s ironic that the company who almost singlehandedly kicked off the running shoe boom is now focusing so much effort on restoring the feel of natural running, but that’s exactly what’s happened. There are now several different lines of Nike Free footwear; the one I’ll be reviewing next week is the Free Everyday 2.0.

Newton: A relative newcomer to the athletic shoe market, Newton courts the high-performance athlete with its Gravity shoe (pictured). They’ve made a significant impact on the triathlon community, and corralled several professional triathletes into their stable. They even provide instructional videos on their website explaining midfoot running form.

ECCO: Better known for their high-end dress shoes, ECCO is making a strong push in the natural running market with its BIOM Project performance shoes. They offer two different models representing increasing degrees of transition towards minimalist running, and their production process is unique in several noteworthy ways. Like everything else ECCO makes, the BIOM is a first-class shoe born from an extensive background of research and expertise.

ECCO BIOM

MBT: Short for Masai Barefoot Technology. Self-described as the “Anti-Shoe”, MBT is something of a wildcard in this category. The shoes are heavy, and bulky, and purposely designed to keep you unstable. MBT primarily makes dress shoes, as well as a few athletic models that are, per the company’s own instructions, not intended for running. They seem to be the polar opposite of what barefooters are looking for, but many people swear by their positive effect on injury prevention and overall health.


Plain Ol’ Naked

Of course, hardcore barefooters will tell you that none of these shoes are the same as running with naked feet – and they’re right. As much as shoes will try to replicate the form, function, and feel of the human foot, they’ll never make a product fully comparable to the original. (Which is probably a good thing.) And for an extremely small percentage of the running community, that’s all that needs to be said.

For the rest of us, the worlds of minimal and natural footwear are definitely worth exploring, especially as they continue to expand and evolve in response to the growing demand. Over the next several weeks, I’ll be doing precisely that kind of exploration.

Read more...

September 1, 2009

Planting a Seed

Actual exchange between my wife and me, shortly after my Vibram FiveFingers review was posted last week ...

Wife: So do you think you could run 100 miles in those things?

Me: Hmm ... I don't know. [pause] Yes. [long pause] Maybe. [longer pause] Um ... I don't know.

Wife: Seems like it would be pretty hard.

Such a thought honestly wasn't on my mind - this is supposed to be my self-imposed hiatus from racing, after all - but it usually doesn't take much to get me pondering things. And just when I think I'm out, some innocuous little comment is all it takes to trigger that familiar feeling of getting pulled back in all over again.

I really wish I had more impulse control sometimes. My crazy brain is going to get me in trouble one of these days.

(Maybe I should start with a 50 ...)

Read more...
Related Posts with Thumbnails

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP