December 14, 2009

Black Diamond Icon Headlamp Review and Battery Pack Giveaway

The more I learn about all these outdoor companies, the more fascinating their stories become. They’re also becoming more and more interconnected.

Case in point: remember this summer, when I profiled the Patagonia company for a review of their Release running shoe, and went on to pretty much fall in love with both their performance standards and their commitment to social responsibility? As far as I’m concerned, Patagonia is the gold standard for the outstanding positive impact a dedicated company is capable of generating in all aspects of its reach.

Well, it turns out that the whole Patagonia thing was really just a side business for founder Yvon Chouinard; his primary enterprise was manufacturing equipment for rock climbing and skiing; a company that eventually (after a roundabout process - see here for the whole story) became Black Diamond.


During its 20 years of existence, Black Diamond has stuck to its guns in terms of the outdoor activities that inspire them – or, as the company’s own website will tell you, “It’s all about climbing and skiing.” It’s a testament to their product quality that Black Diamond’s prominence among trail runners exists not because of an aggressive marketing push to rebrand itself as a running company, but because athletes have actively sought out their lighting systems for reliable performance.

While the Spot lamp I reviewed last week is the company’s most affordable (as well as most popular) option for trail runners, I mentioned that its brightness is somewhat lacking for taking on highly technical trails in the dark. For those conditions, the Icon is Black Diamond’s recommended model. Like the Spot, it’s a tremendous value on its own, and like my previous review, Wilderness Running Company is helping to make it an even more attractive buy. But first, let’s get to the details.


Like the Spot, the Icon features separate bulbs for spot or flood, modes that are alternated by scrolling through the power off position (this inability to switch from spot to flood without turning the lamp off remains my biggest pet peeve about Black Diamond lamps – but it’s becoming less of an issue the more I use it). The spot bulb is a 3-watt LED that can shoot 100 meters, and the flood mode uses 4 high-powered LEDs that give off 100 lumens of brightness.

That’s the strength of the Icon, or any of the larger (non-compact) headlamp models out there – they throw plenty of light to see all the rocks, roots, lumps and bumps on the trail. The tradeoff is that the necessary battery power requires an external pack in addition to the lamp casing. The difference from one brand to another becomes one of efficiency: how long the batteries last, how much the overall unit weighs, and how comfortable the whole contraption feels on your head after the sun comes up, because they’re generally too large to tuck into a small pocket.

From a comfort standpoint, the Icon performs pretty well. At 6.6oz (187g), it’s not the lightest headlamp of this variety out there, but it’s on the low end of a category where lamps often weigh in at 8oz or more. If you’re really hammering the pace, you’ll certainly notice the weight difference between this lamp and the much lighter (85g) Spot – but if you’re logging your miles more casually, the weight doesn’t seem overbearing. Everything stays in place fairly well with the adjustable headband strap, but there’s an additional top strap if necessary for added stability.

The Icon casing features a single on/off button on the bottom that, like the Spot, is large enough to be used with gloved fingers. Both the lamp and battery pack have IPX4 water resistance for good protection against rain from any direction. The casing ratchets to project the beam downward and holds it in place at any angle within its range.

Where the Icon shines (pardon the pun) most prominently is the area of battery efficiency. It uses 3AA batteries, which can last up to 80 hours on the highest brightness setting, and is compatible with rechargeable batteries; an integrated circuit board recognizes the type of batteries used, and automatically calibrates the battery meter to regulate the charge accordingly. An indicator light tells you when you’re below 50% (yellow) or 20% (red) battery life, so you know when it’s time to replace or recharge.


Black Diamond also makes a rechargeable NRG battery pack that fits the Icon, so you’ll never have to buy batteries for this lamp again. This is an especially attractive feature to me; with all of the eco-awareness stuff I’ve been writing about lately, the thought of wasting piles of alkaline batteries year after year grows less and less defensible. The NRG battery pack is especially cool in that you don’t have to remove it from the case to recharge it – the Icon and NRG have an integrated charger port system that plugs directly to a wall outlet. The NRG pack is sold separately and retails for $30, but it makes you totally enviro-friendly, and you’ll still get the 10% discount applied to your total purchase price. It’s not exactly a giveaway, but probably as good a deal as you’ll ever see for this lamp. Click here to check it out. (***Admin note: see also footnote below post.)


Once you have your Icon, there isn’t a trail around that darkness will prevent you from conquering.

*product provided by Wilderness Running Company
**See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you’d like reviewed, contact me at
info@runningandrambling.com.

***If you're debating whether to pick up the Icon this week and wondering how the upcoming lamps I'm reviewing compare, here's an EXTREMELY brief comparison:

1. Petzl MYO RXP: More brightness, regulated output levels, much shorter battery life, and much more expensive (typically $100)

2. Black Diamond Sprinter: Fully rechargeable, has rear blinking LED, lighter overall, more expensive ($80), less brightness (borderline for technical trails).

Full reviews of both are currently available on
FeedTheHabit.com.

Read more...

December 12, 2009

The Battle of Carmel Valley Road

(Admin note: Jesse, send me an e-mail: you’ve won the $15 gift card to Wilderness Running Company. For the rest of you, there will be more giveaways this week, as well as some product reviews and an increasing focus on the upcoming Christmas holiday – which is partially the topic of today’s post.)

The former Carmel Valley Airport is a 25-acre open space which is now frequented more by joggers and dog walkers than by hangars and prop planes. Its runway fell into decay over a period of decades, and the landing strip was permanently closed to air traffic in 2002. (Its importance will never be forgotten, however; this airstrip was actually the driving force in Carmel Valley’s existence - but that’s a whole separate story.)


So you figure that for anyone to get clearance to land at the old airstrip, he must be someone pretty well connected. Someone who could pull a few strings. Someone highly influential.


Someone like Santa Claus.

Santa’s Fly-In is a beloved tradition in our little town, as is the annual Christmas parade that follows immediately afterward.


In typical small-town fashion, most years see more people in the parade than actually watching it from the sidewalks. And when the event happens to fall on a wet and windy weekend, the ratio of paraders to spectators is skewed even more dramatically.

However, since all the participants bring candy to throw, those kids who do brave the conditions are rewarded with a king’s ransom of candy. Sitting in the back of a pickup truck with a huge stash of candy, my 6-year-old daughter and I were throwing whole handfuls of the stuff to everybody we saw …


… including the truckload of junior high and high school kids immediately in front of us. The exchange possibly started as a few errant pieces of candy from one group coming close to the other, but quickly escalated into an all-out candy fight between the two adjacent vehicles. I quickly saw the writing on the wall when I considered:

1) The older kids were throwing from in front of us, so our truck was moving towards their attack, while their truck was constantly pulling away from ours, and …

2) They were throwing hard candy like Jolly Ranchers and Hershey’s kisses, while we were throwing “floaty” stuff like mini-Snickers and Starburst, and ..

3) My allies in battle against the pack of teenagers were a 6-year-old and an 11-year-old.

In other words, I was at a significant strategic and material disadvantage.

Fortunately, all of our skirmishes were conducted in fun, nobody lost an eye or was otherwise wounded, and when the parade was over, we all went our separate ways in good spirits. It’s another nice feature of life here in our little town: we like to enjoy ourselves, and we appreciate sharing these collective holiday traditions together.

But next year, I’m totally bringing some stronger ammunition.

Read more...

Muppet Jingle Bells; MoodBoost Winners

A short weekend post today, to announce a drawing winner and spread a bit of Christmas cheer ...

First things first: dziendobry and 21CM, e-mail me (info@runingandrambling.com) your address - you've won a sample box of the MoodBoost drink I reviewed earlier this week. And for anybody else who'd still like to try some, Monarch Nutrition is offering a discount code for 20% off your purchase; type coupon code BLOG20 at checkout for the reduced price. Link to the MoodBoost site is here.

**
As for the Christmas cheer ... the follwing video has been my daughters' favorite new Christmas song so far this year: Andrea Bocelli's rendition of "Jingle Bells", accompanied by The Muppets. They debuted on a PBS special earlier this fall, and performed on the Jay Leno Show last week. Leno's version is on Hulu but not YouTube, so you have to suffer through a typically awkward 40-second PBS intro for the embedded video below - but that's what the scroll bar is for, right?

Additionally: The Muppets have pretty outstanding range, wouldn't you say? 2 weeks ago they were rocking out to Queen, and now they're alongside one of the most talented operatic singers in the world. It helps to prove what I've believed all along: there should be a little Muppet in all of us.

Andrea Bocelli with The Muppets, "Jingle Bells" (click to play):

Read more...

December 10, 2009

Comparison Review: Petzl Tikka XP2 and Black Diamond Spot; WRC Gift Card Giveaway

(Admin note: The Running and Rambling holiday giveaway train keeps on rolling! The MoodBoost drawing is still open for entry until 7PM Friday, and today begins another drawing for a Wilderness Running Company gift card. Oh, there’s also a product review today – but it’s a bit unorthodox compared to previous versions. Read on.)

**
I appear to be outgrowing my website.

Over the past several months I’ve been incredibly fortunate to receive an overwhelming amount of gear to review – so much that it’s gradually crowding out the other content (read: random nonsense) I like to present here. And since I’m not inclined to turn this blog into a 100% product review site (although I hope it’s a reliable resource for that purpose), another outlet to post the reviews seemed like an outstanding proposition.

Luckily, that’s exactly what happened. This fall I began contributing product reviews to FeedTheHabit.com, a large outdoor gear review site based in Utah. Given their physical location, they test a lot of skiing and winter sports equipment, as well as gear for camping, hiking, and mountain biking. The owner of FTH also does a fair amount of trail running, and I’ll be contributing content in that area along with him. So if you don’t already know about the site, be sure to check it out – and today’s post is something of an incentive to go there.


My first post for FTH was back in October, with a review of the Petzl Tikka XP2 headlamp – it’s Petzl’s equivalent model to Black Diamond’s Spot, which I reviewed here earlier this week. Instead of reprinting the XP2 review, I’m just going to link to it, and ask you to come back here for the head-to-head comparison from both reviews. And to make sure you return, I’m making this post the entry point for my next $15 WRC gift card giveaway.

Is this getting confusing yet? Let me simplify:

1) Go read my Petzl Tikka XP2 headlamp review on FeedTheHabit.com, then…
2) Return here to read the comparison between the XP2 and the Spot, and …
3) Post a comment to enter the drawing for a WRC gift card. Easy as that. Now get going.

**

Are you back? I’ll take your word for it that you read the FTH review. So which compact headlamp is better – the Petzl Tikka XP2 or the Black Diamond Spot? They’re both very solid options, and each has its advantages over the other. Here’s the tale of the tape:


Bulb Type:
Spot: separate LEDs for spot and flood modes, no red LED
XP2: single LED, 1 red LED
Advantage: If you like red LEDs, advantage XP2. Otherwise, the type of bulb doesn’t really matter as much as …


Brightness:
Spot: 47 lumens
XP2: 60 lumens
Advantage: XP2. The difference is certainly noticeable.


Beam types:
Spot: spot (well, duh …), flood, and strobe
XP2: spot, flood, and strobe
Advantage: XP2, because you can switch from flood to spot modes by flipping a diffuser lid up or down, instead of cycling through the “power off” mode with the Spot.

(Boy, it doesn’t seem like much of a contest so far, huh? Keep reading ... )


Maximum beam distance:
Spot: 70m
XP2: 60m
Advantage: Spot. Black Diamond’s entry has lower candle power, but shoots its beam farther. If you tend to use the spot mode more than the flood mode, this is the lamp for you.


Weight (with batteries):
Spot: 85g
XP2: 88g
Advantage: Spot, but just barely – because I’d be surprised if you can actually feel the 3 grams difference.


Battery type and lifespan:
Spot: 3AAA, 100 hour lifespan on high setting. Rechargeable batteries not recommended.
XP2: 3AAA, 80 hour lifespan. Compatible with rechargeable batteries.
Advantage: XP2, mainly because of my bias towards using rechargeables. We should all make an effort to be greener this way, shouldn’t we?


Price:
Spot: $40
XP2: $55
Advantage: Spot, in a big way. When I said this was the most affordable option for trail runners, I wasn’t kidding around. Wilderness Running Company offers a 10% discount (coupon code R&R10) on both of these lamps, but doesn’t currently have the XP2 in stock. It’s coming soon, I’m told.


So which one’s right for you? If you want something basic, efficient, and very affordable with adequate brightness for roads and groomed trails, go with the Spot. If you’re willing to pay 37% more for 28% more candle power and a few more features (red LED, spot/flood diffuser and rechargeable battery capability), then the XP2 is your lamp.

**

Congratulations - you made it to part 3! Either that, or you just scrolled here after reading the first paragraph. Don’t worry, it doesn’t matter to me – just leave a comment below to be entered for a $15 Wilderness Running Company gift card. Good luck!


*Tikka XP2 headlamp provided by Petzl America
**See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you'd like reviewed, contact me at info@runningandrambling.com.

Read more...

December 9, 2009

MoodBoost Drink Review and Giveaway

I normally steer clear of the often murky world of so-called “nutraceuticals” – nutritional products that claim pharmaceutical properties and remarkable health benefits. There are far too many players in the game and far too little regulation for everything you hear to be legitimate.

So I was fairly skeptical to try a new product by Monarch Nutrition called MoodBoost, a drink that claims to brighten your psychological outlook and provide you with sustained energy throughout the day, all without caffeine or any artificial ingredients. Having tried it for a while, I wouldn’t say I’m blown away, but I’m interested enough to describe it briefly here and offer samples for a couple of readers to test for themselves.


MoodBoost is a natural energy drink consisting of vitamins, minerals, amino acids and herbal extracts. The formula supposedly supports proper body function while raising energy levels and supporting mental wellbeing. It comes in powdered form in individual serving packets, and dissolves in water. Each serving packet contains only 20 calories.

There’s only one flavor, called “Refreshing Tropical” which tastes like an orange creamsicle. The flavor is actually quite nice, but I found it a little bit strong for the recommended 8-12oz of water. For the past several weeks I’ve been dissolving a single serving packet in a 20-oz water bottle, and it makes a tasty fluid replacement drink for my long morning runs. Since I prefer diluted drinks instead of super sweet (and sugar-dense) sports drinks, the low-calorie aspect has been the biggest selling point of MoodBoost for me.

As for the health and wellness claims, I’m going to plead ignorance. The laundry list of ingredients in MoodBoost is pretty impressive - including high-dose Vitamin B12 for energy metabolism, minerals and amino acids for healthy nervous system function, and herbal extracts such as St John’s Wort and Gingko Biloba to help decrease stress levels – but I’m not enough of an expert on any of these nutrients to verify their effectiveness. I didn’t notice a significant increase in my normal energy level – however, I might be what researchers call an “outlier”; the exorbitantly high levels of Diet Pepsi coursing through my veins at any given time throughout the day probably don’t make me the ideal candidate to test this particular variable.

I can’t honestly say that I felt more cheerful than usual while drinking MoodBoost, either. Like I said, I usually drink it while running … so of course I’m going to be in a good mood. A bad run is still generally better than my greatest day at work, or a lot of other things I could be doing. I’m also pretty sure I still get grumpy just as often as I usually do. Besides, this whole arena seems so subjective to me that I’d have an extremely hard time simply correlating a particularly “good day” to the sports drink I had that morning.

Regardless, MoodBoost does have some strong points that might be worth trying. The individual packaging makes it easily transportable to take to work or tuck into a pocket to refill your water bottles on a long run or bike ride. It tastes pretty nice, and it’s a good low-calorie alternative to traditional sports drinks.

MoodBoost is sold online for $15 per box of 20 serving packets – but as part of my December giveaway spree, Monarch Nutrition has agreed to provide sample boxes to two readers. We’ll follow the usual procedure here: leave a comment below this post by 7PM PST on Friday Dec 9th, and I’ll announce the winner over the weekend.

*Product provided by Monarch Nutrition
**See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you’d like reviewed, contact me at
info@runningandrambling.com

Read more...

December 8, 2009

Simple CARport Shoe Review

One of the nicest coincidences of my recent barefoot shoe series was discovering just how closely natural footwear companies and eco-friendliness go hand in hand (or, um … foot in shoe. Something like that.)

I suppose it shouldn’t surprise me; as a general rule, most barefoot practitioners - either runners, or just everyday shoephobes - tend to have a dominant “love your Mother Earth” gene, which is manifest in environmental protection and social responsibility. It’s not much of a stretch to think that corporations founded by like-minded souls would translate those philosophies to product manufacturing.

Unfortunately, the shoe business is treacherous territory for companies attempting sustainable production methods or striving to minimize their global impact; chemicals, adhesives, plastics, animal products and excess waste are all part of the game. If a company can somehow navigate those stormy waters and still manage to make products that actually look great and perform well, they deserve to be recognized.

That’s why I’m glad I got to know the Simple Shoe company a lot better over the past several months. They’re not perfect, but they’re striving to do all the right things, with a stated goal of having 100% sustainable production. Or as they describe themselves on their website, Simple is a nice little shoe company getting in touch with its inner hippie.

A couple of weeks ago I reviewed the GUMshoe, a lightweight loafer/sandal made from hemp and recycled carpet padding, among other things. This week features the CARport, a casual sneaker with similar eco-friendly credentials.


The upper of the CARport is made with breathable suede from certified eco-friendly tanneries (those with an ISO 14001 certification, if you’re really interested), as well as certified organic cotton flannel linings and laces. All of the cotton used in Simple footwear is cultivated and harvested without the use of pesticides or other toxic chemicals – it also makes for a very comfortable sock-like feel on the inside of the shoe.


More recycled products are used underneath; the “pedbed” midsole is made from post-consumer polyurethane as well as recycled car tire rubber. The entire outsole is also made from recycled tires; Simple estimates that a single used car tire provides outsoles for six pairs of shoes. Given the monumental piles of tires all over the world, the company will never have to manufacture outsoles from any other material.

Aside from stylistic differences, there’s one element of the CARport that I really like compared to the other Simple shoes I tested. When I reviewed the GUMshoe, I complained that the arch support was sewn into the insole, and the insoles were not removable – so in fairness, I’m happy to say that the CARport insoles are completely removable. However, since the midsole is thicker, you don’t have the same ground feel as the lightweight GUMshoe; it’s like you’re on a flat platform that’s elevated an inch or so off the ground. If the company could someday combine these two elements – a removable insole with a minimalist midsole – I’d be in Simple heaven.

The other thing I like about these shoes is that they’re just plain nice-looking. The styling is versatile enough for office or casual wear, and the suede colors (black olive or coffee liqueur) complement a wide variety of wardrobe options. They’re also comfortable enough that you can wear them all day long, so going from work to a relaxed evening out doesn’t automatically require a change of shoes.

The Simple Carport retails for $70 from Endless.com (with free overnight shipping) as well as on the company website. It’s an easy way to look respectable while still indulging your inner hippie.


*Product provided by Simple Shoes
**See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you’d like reviewed, contact me at
info@runningandrambling.com.

Read more...

December 7, 2009

The Barefoot Files: Where Do We Go Now?

“Where do we go –
Where do we go now?”
- Guns ‘N’ Roses, “Sweet Child O’ Mine” (video after post)

After being humbled at my most recent attempt at barefoot trail running, I mentioned that there were some big picture questions that would be addressed. Or, to quote an exchange between a friend and me during a recent trail run while I was wearing Vibram FiveFingers:

Friend: So how does this all end for you?

Me: You mean, like … the barefoot thing? Or life in general?

Friend: Let’s start with the first one. Worry about the other one later.


So I guess in that context, even though I’m saying “big picture” here, what I actually mean is “infinitesimally small picture that currently wields illogically disproportionate importance”. It’s always good to be reminded of that.

On to the question at hand: how does the barefoot experiment end? I stated at the outset that my intention was never to become a 100% barefoot runner; what went unspoken was any sort of secondary goal or accomplishment to indicate that I had “made it” as a barefooter.

The end point was purposely kept vague, in that I want barefoot and minimalist running to be an ongoing aspect of my training, just like hill workouts and tempo runs and the swimming and mountain biking I do for cross-training. I want the freedom to say, “You know what? I don’t feel like wearing shoes today,” and take off on a 7-mile trail run anyway. Conversely, I want to be able to decide - as I did one day last week – “My feet are pretty fried; I need to wear regular shoes today,” without feeling like I’ve fallen off the wagon or broken some sort of covenant. Simply put, I want barefoot running to be just another part of my repertoire. I’ll go through phases when I practice it frequently, and others (primarily during the winter) when I drift away for a bit.

Although I’m ambiguous about the destination, I’m absolutely certain about a handful of lessons I’ve learned along the way – and those are the items I’ll share here. With that in mind, here are some main talking points:


Barefoot running is fun: Above all else, this is the overriding factor in my continued dedication to barefoot running. Some runners come become barefooters to escape nagging injuries, others do it as a statement against materialism and “shoe industry cartels”, but I did it simply as a curiosity. I can give it up at anytime – but I know that I won’t, because I enjoy it too darn much.

Be a kid ... go barefoot!

There’s really no sensation that compares with feeling the ground against the soles of your feet, or the air between your toes with each stride, or the lightness of being unrestrained by shoes. You see and feel all of your surroundings in an entirely different way. It’s liberating and empowering, but also restrictive and humbling. When I’m scampering around like a ragamuffin in public, I feel simultaneously like a meager child of the Earth and a hardcore tough guy. And I realize that's all contradictory and doesn’t make any sense, so you’ll just have to take my word for it - or better yet, give it a try sometime to see what I mean.


Barefoot running hurts: This seems incongruous with what I just said above, but believe me, it’s true. Although I became (and remain) pretty comfortable running on asphalt surfaces, all it takes is one stretch of rocky gravel or chip and seal roadway – not to mention any sub-40 degree morning - to make me wince in pain. And even though I can get to the point where some trails are tolerable, my soles haven't grown comfortable enough to where I can forget about them for even a second, or take my eyes off the ground to enjoy the sights around me. Therefore, I’ve concluded that …


Minimalist footwear is awesome: I mentioned this in a previous installment, but it’s worth repeating: even the mythical Tarahumara Indians wear protection for their feet. And while traditional running shoes are clearly unnecessary, there’s definitely a lot to be said for having a basic layer of protection between your naked feet and the potential hazards of the ground below.


Standing tall in VFFs, high above the Salinas Valley

Thankfully, there are some outstanding options out there: Vibram’s FiveFingers – either the KSO model, or the newly-released KSO Trek - will remain my gold standard for trail running until something better is invented, which I honestly can’t even imagine happening. The Feelmax Osma is an ideal solution for road running (and unlike when I reviewed it, it’s now available in the United States), and Sockwas give you the most barefoot feel imaginable. Vivo Barefoot’s about to jump in the game as well, with the release of its Evo performance shoe in 2010. Each of these brands offers nearly all the benefits of barefoot running, with almost none of the risks. I’ve logged fairly high mileage in minimal trainers over the past 6 months, and will continue to do so permanently. On the other hand …


I want shoes during an ultra: An unspoken consideration throughout almost all of my trail runs has been whether the VFFs or other minimal footwear would be a feasible option for running ultras. It has been done before, even at the 100 mile distance, so it’s not like I’m venturing into uncharted waters. Even so, the longest trail run I’ve done in VFFs is about 15 miles, but my overall comfort level during long runs isn’t where I’d want it to be if I’m someday approaching 50M or 100K again. If I slowed down enough, the discomfort wouldn’t be an issue - but knowing myself, I don’t think I could completely abandon my competitive nature or any attention to the clock when I’ve got a bib number pinned to my shorts.

Someday, perhaps after a few thousand more training miles, my speed in VFFs may approach my shod speed on steep and rugged trails, in which case, the whole premise I just described would be moot. Until then, I’ll be wearing shoes for trail racing. However …


I need much less shoe than I thought: This has been the happiest revelation of the whole process: I don’t really need the super-cushioned, extra-supportive, heavy duty SUV-style shoes that I’d been trending toward in recent years. Getting rid of them requires an adjustment period, for sure, but the transformation took place much quicker than I thought.

In fact, my whole philosophy about trail shoes has undergone a seismic shift. All I’m really looking for now is a measure of traction for tricky terrain, a token amount of cushioning for comfort, and a covering to keep my toes warm. Other than that, I’m completely a “less is more” guy: less weight, less structure, less heel, and a lower profile to allow natural foot and ankle function.

Best of all, I’m not the only one who feels this way; a handful of companies have been designing trail running shoes with just this idea in mind. And yes, I’ll present you with reviews for some of them in the near future.

And the final lesson I’ve learned …


Barefoot isn’t just for running: An underlying question at the heart of the whole barefoot running movement is this: if barefoot running is so great for you, why don’t we spend more time barefoot walking? So you can understand my delight in discovering so many natural footwear options lately.

Vivo Barefoot Lesotho - review coming soon

Just as it has for running footwear, my whole philosophy regarding everyday footwear has been turned on its head in the past 6 months. Minimalist shoes extend the benefits of the barefoot lifestyle, feel great to wear, and come in a variety of options for almost every possible circumstance. Vivo Barefoot has to be considered the leader in offering the most stylish barefoot options, but many other companies are recognizing that high fashion and natural foot function don’t have to be mutually exclusive.

I guess all this is a long-winded way of saying that there really isn’t an end point to any of this - just an ongoing activity and underlying philosophy that have shaped my overall running experience in more positive ways than I can possibly describe. This Great Barefoot Experiment of mine may never reach a definite conclusion; hopefully it’s destined to be a continual work in progress.

*See previous installments of this series on sidebar at right.

**
As for the band … technically, they never reached a definite conclusion either, since the name “Guns ‘N’ Roses” is still currently owned and exploited by Axl Rose and whichever 4 flunkies he’s persuaded to play with him lately. For 99.9% of hard rock fans, however, GNR was a shooting star that rose meteorically before burning out in a brilliant fury in the mid 1990s. When the original lineup was together, there wasn’t another rock band around who held a candle to them.

This song is noteworthy for two reasons: 1) it’s the only GNR song my wife would ever listen to with me, and 2) the guitar intro still stands as one of the most distinctive melodies ever written. Don’t ask me which reason is more significant.

Guns ‘N’ Roses, “Sweet Child O’ Mine” (click to play):

Read more...
Related Posts with Thumbnails

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP