May 6, 2010

How Young Is Too Young?

If you haven’t heard of Jordan Romero yet, chances are that you will in the very near future.

Jordan is a 13-year-old Californian who is currently making a summit attempt on Mount Everest; it’s the kind of story that simultaneously makes you say “Whoa, cool!” and “Wait … what?” His journey has gained a lot of attention, with recent profiles on all the major network news programs and CNN (which used to be a major news outlet), as well as a great deal of family-driven self-promotion from his website and various new media outlets.


image from JordanRomero.com

The prospect of an adolescent kid taking on Mount Everest – as well as the parents who support and fund such an undertaking – is far too complicated for me to analyze in a single blog post. That’s why I was thrilled to read an outstanding feature article on Jordan’s quest in Outside Magazine last month – the link for which is provided below.

While reading that article, I was reminded of a New York Times piece from last fall that recalled a generation of very young kids who ran the New York City Marathon before age limits were instituted. On some levels, it was just a matter of scale between concerns the running community had back then, and those that the mountain climbing community is struggling with now. Obviously, climbing Mount Everest is a much bigger, much more potentially deadly pursuit than running an ultra, but many of the considerations for and against such activities are quite similar.

That’s the premise I used for the Monterey Herald article that follows. This was also one of those rare times when I’m thankful for an editor-enforced word count, because I could have very easily stretched this from 600 words to 1500 without even looking up from the monitor. However, you’ll be shortchanging yourselves if you skip the more detailed articles - especially the one on Romero – so be sure to follow those links for a more comprehensive read on the situations.

I also had a lot of help on this article from a friend of mine who happens to be the medical director of the Big Sur Marathon. He has an interesting perspective on the issue, having been one of those kids who ran a marathon at age 13 and a 50-miler at age 14, and who is now a member of the board that enforces the 16-year-old age minimum at Big Sur. The point of the article below isn’t necessarily to make a recommendation about these guidelines one way or the other; my intention was mainly to throw a question out there that might trigger some interesting discussion.

Finally, if you want to track Jordan’s progress in something close to real time, his team posts frequent updates here on his blog. The question of whether or not he should be there is now moot; the only thing left for us to do in this case is follow along and see what happens.


Running Life 5/6/10 “How Young is Too Young?”

As you’re reading this, 13-year-old Jordan Romero of Big Bear, CA, is bivouacked at 22,000’ on the slopes of Mount Everest, preparing for a summit bid that would make him the youngest person ever to stand on the world’s highest peak.

Despite his age, Romero is no novice; he’s climbed to the highest points on five other continents, and has more mountaineering experience than many “tourist climbers” who pay for guided expeditions on Everest. However, his attempt has been met with equal parts praise and outrage by experienced mountain climbers. Some see him as a role model for a generation of unhealthy, overweight kids. Others consider him a poster boy for reckless ambition and misguided parental prioritization. [See Outside Magazine’s profile of Jordan.]

The question is simple, but the answer is incredibly complex: how old should kids be before taking on extreme athletic challenges?

The running community grapples with a similar dilemma – albeit on a less dramatic scale than mountain climbing – in considering at what age children should be permitted to enter marathons or ultramarathons. Nearly every race today has a minimum age requirement, but in the 1970s, very young runners were somewhat commonplace at major marathons.

Prior to instituting a minimum age of 18 in 1981, the New York City Marathon saw approximately 75 runners aged 8 to 13 cross its finish line in the late 1970s. [See this New York Times article.] The Los Angeles Marathon’s Students Run LA program annually trains kids ages 12 to 18 to finish the event. Locally, the Big Sur Marathon’s minimum age is 16 – although in an interesting twist, its medical director ran his first marathon at age 13, and his first ultra at age 14. Last month, four 16-year-olds successfully completed Big Sur's challenging 26.2-mile Highway 1 course.

So how young is too young? Is 12 or 16 more risky than 18? What about 10? Or 8? And what exactly is the rationale for any of these guidelines?

The American Academy of Pediatricians recommends that runners focus on shorter events like the 10K or half-marathon until age 18. A group called the International Marathon Medical Directors Association cites the AAP guideline in its own recommendation for an 18-year-old age requirement. Curiously, the standards are based as much on psychological considerations as they are on physiology.

For example, it’s true that kids with developing bones and muscles are highly susceptible to overuse injuries with endurance running – but this is a consequence for many adults who train excessively as well. Children’s bodies aren’t as adept at thermoregulation, leaving them susceptible to heat-related problems during a race – but the bodies of novice marathoners are equally unprepared in this regard. Overall, the physical risks of the marathon for youngsters aren’t significantly greater than those for adults.

Instead, the primary concern expressed by most running authorities, as well as grown-ups who started as extremely young distance runners, is that kids might be trying the marathon for the wrong reasons, and might burn out on running relatively early in life. From a standpoint of promoting lifelong health, it’s always better for runners of any age to build up to the marathon gradually, over a period of years instead of weeks. And if parental pressures are any factor in a child entering the marathon, the likelihood of he or she continuing as independent adults is fairly low.

In the end, every situation is unique to the individuals involved, in running just as it is in mountain climbing. There will always be precocious kids who are physically gifted and genuinely self-driven enough to take on such challenges, and there will always be some who are better off building up to such things patiently. The only things we can wish for Jordan Romero or any other young athletes are for them always to be safe, have fun, and develop a passion for healthy activity that lasts a lifetime.

Read more...

May 4, 2010

Minimal? Inconceivable!

“You keep using that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.”
- Inigo Montoya, from The Princess Bride (clip after post)

*
Just because you say something over and over, that doesn’t make it true. Someone needs to get that message out to Saucony.

They’ve created something of a buzz – but not in a particularly good way – with their introduction of the ProGrid Kinvara, heralded (by Saucony, at least) as a wonderful new minimalist shoe. To reinforce the idea, the word “minimal” is used three times in the first 15 seconds of the video that follows below.

But keep watching, and you hear this as well: the Kinvara is a minimalist shoe “with maximum cushioning”. You see a diagram for the patented ProGrid support system in the heel to protect you from ground impact. And you’ll watch a whole group of slow motion runners landing almost unanimously with heavy heelstrikes, the exact thing you’re NOT supposed to do in true minimalist footwear.

Obviously, that word doesn't mean what Saucony thinks it means. (And if anyone else needs a refresher, I did a pretty thorough explanation here last September.) The Kinvara might be a nice shoe, and it might represent a paradigm shift away from overbuilt and overly corrective footwear towards more natural foot function - I hope it does, personally – but if there’s one thing it’s not, it’s a minimalist shoe.

More cynically, this whole development might be just a money grab from a company looking to cash in on the latest fad in running. The formula is fairly simple: make something distinctive enough to stand apart from your other models, then throw trendy buzzwords around like crazy in hopes of retaining a share of the customer base that’s been deserting you in favor of true minimalist shoes. I’m hoping this isn’t the case here, but from my standpoint, it’s honestly hard to tell.

You may as well just watch the Kinvara video and decide for yourself. And afterwards, I dare you to watch the Princess Bride clip and tell me that Saucony doesn’t have more than a little bit of Vizzini (the bald guy) in them on this one.


"Saucony ProGrid Kinvara" (click to play):





"Inconceivable Mashup" (click to play):

Read more...

May 3, 2010

Newton Gravity 2010 Running Shoe Review

"No great discovery was ever made without a bold guess."
- Sir Isaac Newton, 1643-1727

When I reviewed their original Gravity trainers last September, I made reference to the fact that Newton was barely a three-year-old business founded by a pair of guys with very little industry experience prior to entering the high-performance running shoe game. The company was named after a historic scientist, and offered a product whose design flew in the face of all the conventional wisdom of the day. Newtons were some of the most expensive shoes on the market, and required athletes to abandon the running form most of them had used all their lives.

In other words, success of the concept was something of a bold guess.

However, as another scientist of some renown – a fellow by the name of Albert Einstein – once explained, everything is relative: motion, space, and even our notion of time. In fields of different gravitational potential, time actually moves at different speeds; gravitational time dilation, as it’s called, predicts that clocks will run more slowly when they’re closer to the center of a field with massive gravitational pull.

Now before you press rewind ‘cuz I blew your mind, let me put it this way: sometimes, four years is a very long time to be involved in something – especially if that something is an area (or field, in our analogy) that new players have been moving towards (gravitational pull) in increasing numbers with every passing month. And that’s exactly where Newton finds itself nowadays: right smack in the center of this whole “natural running” supernova that has emerged, where four years is a relative eternity compared to all the other companies rushing to develop something similar.


Newton Gravity

From the outset, the Gravity has been Newton’s flagship model, a top-of-the-line performance trainer that has attracted a large number of elite athletes - triathletes in particular – as well as amateur runners who want the biomechanics of barefoot or minimalist running without actually giving up the comfort and performance aspects of a standard running shoe. Most of its features like actuator lugs, action/reaction technology, and land-lever-lift technique have already been explained in my previous review, so rather than re-writing them here, I’m giving you the link above to check it all out.


8mm actuator lugs protruding under midfoot

This is also a good time to make a certain disclaimer: hardcore barefoot runners and minimalist proponents tend to dislike Newtons. The shoes are too heavy, too high off the ground - 26mm in the heel, 23mm in the forefoot - and, well … just too much shoe to accurately mimic barefoot running. While all of those points are well taken, it’s also worth noting that Newton doesn’t claim to make minimalist shoes; their main selling point is replicating the mechanics (and therefore, nearly all the benefits) of barefoot running while incorporating advanced technology features to improve comfort and performance.

Newton has a lot of science on its side, and contracts third party researchers to compare factors like decreased impact forces and improved energy return between its shoes and the most popular cushioning or performance trainers currently on the market. If you’re going to claim that your shoes help people run faster, you’d better be able to back it up; thanks to ongoing lab testing and comparative analysis, Newton does.

Anecdotally, I can attest to the fact that Newtons make it easy to run fast. I’m currently in a high-mileage buildup for the spring and summer, and probably 90% of that mileage is either barefoot or in minimalist shoes (typically Soft Star, VivoBarefoot, or Vibram). Given the rough, hilly terrain I frequent, and the length of the runs I’m doing, most of my mileage tends to be the slow and steady variety. However, once or twice per week, I lace up my Gravity trainers for a tempo run or track workout, and I can still keep a 6-minute pace for a handful of miles.

Best of all, when wearing Newtons, I don’t have to sacrifice the midfoot/forefoot gait pattern I’ve developed in minimalist footwear simply to run fast. Although the heel and midfoot are both elevated, the difference in heights is a mere 3mm, which is the flattest platform you’ll find in a standard trainer. My posture, footstrike, and muscle recruitment are all the same as when I’m running barefoot; the only difference is that my feet are a lot more comfortable.


Improved high-durability outsole

The 2010 version of the Gravity generally has the same style and fit as its predecessor, with a few tweaks that I would mostly call improvements. One change in the wrong direction is that this version is slightly heavier – 10.3oz compared to 9.4oz last year. Everything else is for the better: a more durable outsole, a higher-rebound EVA midsole for improved energy return, and, most noticeably, a more subtle blue option to make up for the screaming reds and oranges of models past. The upper is still incredibly open and airy, with plenty of room in the toe box for your toes to function independently and naturally.


Light, airy uppers

Another aspect that remains the same is the price point of $175, which remains the biggest barrier to entry for many users. Last fall, I argued that the high ticket price helped ensure a commitment to practicing midfoot running form. Now that I’m a more dedicated minimalist runner, I’ve come to appreciate the value of Newtons a lot more than I used to.

I love having a “standard” shoe option that I can wear for days when I want to hammer out some fast miles, or when I want to get another 15-miler to finish the week when my legs and feet are thrashed from the 60 or 70 they’ve already done, without having to revert back to a forward-sloped high-heeled cushioned trainer. (And if I ever wanted to race a marathon again instead of running just for fun, I would definitely use Newtons to help me do it.) In that regard, they’re fairly unique among all other shoe companies, with the possible exception of the $225 ECCO BIOM – so by comparison, the Newtons seem like something of a bargain.

At this point, it’s pretty clear that Newton’s bold guess to promote unconventional running form has been a success. The extensive experimentation and study of barefoot mechanics they've applied since the company's inception are now drawing in consumers and competitors alike, as more and more people are discovering the advantages of midfoot running. If you’re happy in your peripheral orbit of traditional footwear, there’s probably no reason for you to try these. If, on the other hand, you’re finding yourself pulled toward the expanding field of natural running, you’ll probably be quite happy giving in to this particular force of Gravity.



*Product provided by Newton Running
**See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you’d like reviewed, contact me at
info@runningandrambling.com.



Share


Get Running and Rambling delivered to your inbox! Click here to receive new posts via e-mail.

Read more...

GU Giveaway Winners; New Jack Johnson Single

I'm keeping things brief today, basically as a placeholder before a longer review tomorrow, and as an announcement of winners from the weekend's GU giveaway. So ... GE Anderson and Sara, e-mail me at info@runningandrambling.com - you've won the GU samplers! Thanks to everyone who entered, and to GU for providing the product.

And so the rest of you don't walk away completely empty-handed, I'll share one more thing our family - my 8-year old daughter and me in particular - has been buzzing about: a preview of the new Jack Johnson single embedded below.

The song seems fairly cool, although a lot of JJ's stuff tends to seep into you over a long period of time, rather than grabbing you right out of the box - so time will tell how this one compares to our other favorites. Rather, the most immediate thing you'll notice is something my daughter said: Hey - Jack Johnson has long hair now!

So there you go: new Jack Johnson, now featuring longer hair. The album comes out June 1st - which is yet another reason that we're looking forward to summer.

Jack Johnson, "You and Your Heart" (click to play):

Read more...

April 30, 2010

Jet Blackberry: Are You Gonna Be My Gel?

I’ve been on the receiving end of some nice generosity from the GU company recently, so today’s post is partly a way for me to share the love with a couple of readers, and partly to see who pays attention to this place on the weekends.

Since the giveaway features two separate items, this post features two separate setups: one that’s something of a clarification, and another that’s a bit of a story.

*
First, the point of clarification: most of us who have done ultras for a number of years were used to seeing GU2O as the featured energy drink at race aid stations. It was also sold in packets and tubs at REI, and developed a loyal following among endurance athletes. So when it started disappearing from store shelves last year, there was a fair amount of “Hey – where’s the GU2O? And what’s this new stuff?” being asked amongst runners, cyclists and triathletes.

The answer is that nothing happened, really. GU2O was rebranded as GU Electrolyte Brew - GU Brew for short – and, according to the website, “retains all of the attributes of GU2O with a slight formulation tweak to improve performance.” It has a 2:1 ratio of maltodextrin to fructose, which effectively supplies working muscles with easily available fuel while stimulating the absorption of electrolytes and fluid from the stomach to promote sustained hydration.


What I liked most about GU2O was that its sweetness was extremely mild, making it easy to take for 6, 12, or 24 hours at a time when necessary. Drinks that are too sweet quickly become sickening, and mixes that taste like water eventually lose their appeal during long-duration activity. GU Brew maintains that just-right balance of sweetness that its predecessor possessed – so if you liked the old mix, you’ll like the new stuff as well.

One sad note is that my favorite TangoMango flavor didn’t make the transition from 2-Oh to Brew, so that was kind of a bummer. It’s been replaced by Blueberry Pomegranate, which is pretty nice as well, but it sure doesn’t taste like mangoes. The other three Brew flavors are the same as the earlier version, and if you win the giveaway, you’ll get a sample packet of all four varieties to test for yourself.

*
And now for my little story …

There was a time almost 20 years ago when I got hooked on long-distance cycling. I lived in North Carolina at the time, and there wasn’t a better way to spend a sweltering summer afternoon than cruising along some bucolic country road (there were lots to choose from), being cooled by a steady breeze that was faintly but sweetly laced with the aroma of tobacco leaves from nearby fields (lots of those, too) until the sun faded enough to make lounging around the home patio a little more tolerable.

Of course, long days in the saddle still required some caloric intake - but in those days my friends and I were living on starving grad student rations, and we weren’t exactly what you’d call sophisticated. So instead of spending our money on cases of energy gels from our local bike shop, we made a habit of pocketing those little jam and jelly packets they have on top of the tables at Denny’s and Waffle House to use as quick sugar fixes on our bike rides. (Classy, huh?)

Over time, we became experts at precisely what kind of fruit toppings to smuggle. We learned to bypass the fruit-juice laden jellies in favor of the real fruit pulp found in jam; we found that berry flavors complemented water or Gatorade better than grape jam or orange marmalade; and I soon decided that blackberry was probably my favorite berry of all.

So why am I telling you all this? Because I had largely forgotten all of that until about 3 months ago, when I tasted my first packet of Jet Blackberry GU. I’m not sure quite how they did this … but it tastes almost exactly like the containers of blackberry jam we used to take from restaurants. Except in this case, it’s a nutritionally supercharged container that’s ideally formulated for endurance activity. The gel has a similar maltodextrin/fructose balance as GU Brew, along with citrates to speed the conversion of carbohydrates to energy molecules, branch chain amino acids (BCAAs) that reduce fatigue by limiting the central nervous system’s production of serotonin, and histidine to help neutralize lactic acid buildup. Throw in some antioxidants, a little chamomile as an anti-inflammatory agent, and a dash of ginger to soothe the stomach, and that’s about the most kick-ass packet of restaurant jelly you can possibly imagine.


The only real downside that I can see is that because of the name, every time I open a packet of Jet Blackberry, I’m reminded of the ridiculously infectious rock tune that follows this post. But that’s my own issue to deal with; as for you, I’ll throw in a couple of packs of Jet Blackberry GU with the Brew samples for whoever wins the drawing.

So that’s the deal: Brew and Blackberry samplers for two winners, drawn randomly from anyone who comments below. Good luck, and I’ll announce on Monday whether Jet is going to be your gel.

**

Jet, “Are You Gonna Be My Girl?” (click to play):


*Products provided by GU Energy.
** See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you'd like reviewed, contact me at info@runningandrambling.com.

Read more...

April 29, 2010

Father/Daughter Day: Big Sur 5K Report

“Look at this big great world that we’re living in –
There's lots of fun to be had on these streets –
We can take a ride just you and me –
It's a jungle gym.”
- Jack Johnson, “Jungle Gym” (video after post)

One thing is certain about Big Sur Marathon weekend: I take it a lot less seriously than I used to.

This used to be the day I had circled on my calendar approximately 364 days ahead of time. The race I relied upon to validate all those early morning workouts, all the pain I habitually inflicted upon myself, and all the time I spent obsessing over my training plans. Most (and, in hindsight, worst) of all, it was the day I used to determine my self-worth for approximately the next 364 days.

Times have definitely changed.

A few years ago, after a streak of 12 BSIMs in a row, I made what was at the time an excruciating decision to sit out the marathon in favor of a pair of ultras on either side of the race date, and did the marathon relay with a group of friends instead. Last year, I received a gift entry, and used it as an opportunity to document all the sights and sounds of the race I’ve loved for so many years. In the process, I realized something: Big Sur is a wonderful race, but it’s not an important race. At least, not in the way it used to be for me.

That’s why I didn’t hesitate for a minute this winter when my 8-year-old daughter asked if she could run the 5K with me this year. Since the marathon and 5K are held simultaneously, it’s impossible to do both events – and four years ago, when my then-3rd grade son did the 5K, I had him run it with his mother so that his big day wouldn’t interfere with my own marathon plans. So … yeah. You could say there's a bit of regret there.

Consequently, my goals for this spring were very basic: to share some quality time with my daughter in training for the race, and try to help her have some fun on race day. I figured that these opportunities might not come along very often, so I may as well enjoy the ride while we’re on it.

(And with that, let’s get to the pics …)


One thing you notice right off the bat on the start line of the 5K is how strangely normal everyone looks. There aren’t any super-skinny people jumping around in singlets, or sucking down energy gel packs like they’re crack cocaine, or jumping into the bushes to pee every 2 minutes. They’re just … people, I guess. Predictably, this struck me as kind of weird.


However, what the marathon and 5K have in common is this: a completely log-jammed first mile. See that red arrow? (Click to enlarge.) It’s pointing at my daughter’s head. After I took this photo, I had to weave my way through at least 100 people to work my way back to her. Fortunately, they were all going at something like 12 min/mile pace, so it didn’t take me very long.


After the first mile, the course goes from road to trail, with the ocean on one side of you, and beautiful coastal foliage and rocky bluffs on the other. It’s also fairly flat, and the crowd has finally thinned out enough to jog at a steady pace. Speaking of which …


My daughter had it in her head that she didn’t want to walk at all during the race – and since it was her idea, I had no problem letting her go for it. Sure enough, she was able to keep a steady jog throughout the whole race. Not only that …


... but she was able to run all the way up the quarter-mile hill that begins mile 3. Best of all, she remembered this little talk we had before the race:

Me: Let me explain what’s going to happen at the start. Everybody’s going to take off like crazy, but we’re going to keep an easy pace and let them all run ahead of us.

Her: OK. How come?

Me: Because in the last half of the race, all those idiots will be walking and gasping for breath, and we’ll start passing people left and right.

Her: Cool. Got it.

So pretty much everyone you’ve seen in these pictures ended up finishing behind us – and on this final hill, we almost had to weave our way through the crowds we were passing.


Perhaps the coolest part of the 5K is that the final 1.1 miles are on the marathon course, so even novice runners can sense some of the relief of seeing this “Hallelujah!” sign, and …


... all of the spectators who are gathering to see the marathon finish warm themselves up by cheering the 5K runners home. My daughter, as well as all the other 5Kers, got the excitement of sprinting down the wide open roadway toward the finish banner while being flanked by well-wishers on either side, without having to run the usual 25 and a half miles to get there – why didn’t I think of this a few years ago?

It’s a wonderfully supportive and encouraging environment, with one exception: you know who doesn’t like to share the excitement of your 5K finish? …


The Marathon Foto people, that’s who. At least, not unless you pay them at least $19.95. They did this to me when I tried to take a picture of my girl standing in front of the “official finisher” backdrop. Not to worry, though; we snuck over to an identical backdrop when no one was looking, and I got my photo … but I’m not posting it here, in case their lawyers are reading this.

And just like that, my daughter’s first 5K was in the books. I honestly have no idea if this is going to become a regular thing, or if she’ll drift away like her older brother did in favor of other athletic pursuits as she gets older. What I’m more sure of is that my goals for the event were met: the time we spent in training was completely rewarding, and my daughter had a fun experience on race day. Come to think of it, shouldn’t those be the goals for every race?

**

And of course, no post about this daughter of mine would be complete without a tune from her favorite singer.

Jack Johnson, "Jungle Gym" (click to play):

Read more...

April 27, 2010

Soft Star RunAmoc Now Available!

If you’ve been following along here for the past month or two, this isn’t so much an announcement as it is an update – but Soft Star's RunAmoc is officially available as of today from the company website.

Soft Star RunAmoc; black perforated leather with street outsole

Links are below – but first, a few follow-up observations …

* The name is RunAmoc! Just like I wanted! I love getting my way sometimes.

* More than any other minimalist shoe I’ve worn, these mocs have a very natural feel to them – I’ve occasionally described it to friends as “tribal” or “native”. There are two pieces of leather or suede held together with a single lace, sitting atop a thin, flat platform; you get the sense that American Indians or indigenous people of nearly every continent might have worn something very much like this at some point. (Sure, the Apaches or Navajos probably didn’t have access to Vibram outsoles – but it’s a simple design with universal utility.) If you didn’t know better, you’d have no idea how much trial, error, and revision was involved with making the finished product.

* Price point for these (as of this posting) is $87. It was the last element of the product launch to fall into place, and by far the one that caused the most discussion, research, and thoughtful consideration on the part of the company.

Basically, the factors involved were these: Soft Star’s not a big corporation looking for huge profit margins – they mainly want to make a nice, high quality product that is as affordable as possible while still sustaining the business and providing for their handful of employees. However, their hand-made products also carry some very unique pricing issues that larger companies don’t have to deal with, such as custom orders (materials, colors, outsoles, accents), specialty sizing (including working from tracings and individual foot measurements at times), and keeping 100% of their materials and construction in the USA.

All of that stuff adds value to the product – and in my opinion, to the whole company – but it comes at a price. The fact that they’ve taken all this into account and still offer a price point that’s similar to a pair of Vibrams is pretty impressive.

* Of course, any comparison to Vibrams has to include durability, and that’s the aspect of the RunAmoc I’m still investigating. I currently have almost 200 miles on my trail soles, and there’s some visible wear in the high-impact areas, but not enough to lose traction yet. Will they last 300 miles? 500? More? I’m not sure yet … but I’ll keep posting updates here as warranted.

Trail outsole after approximately 200 miles; click to enlarge

* Since I’ve already covered much of the information that would be included with an “official” review, for the time being I’ll just refer you to a couple of prior posts for more information: This one explains the product development process, and this one introduces the RunAmoc with perforated leather and a street outsole.

So here are your links: the Soft Star RunAmoc is available in black perforated leather, red perforated leather, or brown suede. Currently the perforated models (officially called RunAmoc Lite) only come in those two colors, but the suede model can be customized in any color. All of those styles can be ordered with either a 2mm street outsole, or extra grippy 5mm trail sole. Check them out, and contact me (in the comments box below) or the company via e-mail if you have any questions. Then go run amuck!


Share


Get Running and Rambling delivered to your inbox! Click here to receive new posts via e-mail.

Read more...
Related Posts with Thumbnails

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP