April 17, 2011

Other Than Me

“I am who I am, who I am, well who am I –
Requesting some enlightenment –
Could I have been anyone other than me?”
- Dave Matthews Band, “Dancing Nancies” (video after post)

What if I told you that this was your house:


Would that be someplace you’d be happy with? A place where you’d feel good about where life has taken you? Wait just a couple minutes before you answer - because the proposition is a bit more complicated than that.

So you live in a trailer; that’s not exactly fantastic news. The good part is you can park it wherever you like – even on a hilltop in the middle of a beautiful open space:



With some wonderful views of the valley below:


And spectacular morning sunrises:


Does that make the situation a little more appealing now?

And what if I told you that you could work from home, so you don’t have to deal with the hassle of a daily commute? There aren’t any corporate politics to frustrate you, and you generally get to make your own hours, as long as you’re available to your employees when they need you.

Yes, you have employees, and you’re the boss. Your role is actually quite important, as you’re responsible for the well-being of a few hundred direct reports:



Although they’re generally well-behaved, they tend to have some difficulty identifying with the larger goals of the organization, so they typically need a lot of guidance and supervision:



Fortunately, you’ve got a few middle managers who are very effective motivators, and can usually be relied upon to direct the front-line staff in working toward a common purpose:



You still have to stay on top of things, however – because every now and then, one of your middle managers might feel like slacking in the shade for a while:


And you're ultimately the person responsible for making sure that everything gets done.

Sometimes in the midst of an early morning run, I contemplate what life as a modern-day shepherd would be like, especially in the unique case of the guy who’s charged with overseeing the Fort Ord open space. I mean … yes, you’d live in a trailer, but the pace of life is blissfully slow. You’d get to spend day after day in one of the most scenic places imaginable, sleeping and waking with the sun, living a life of simplicity rather than battling the complexities and frustrations of the modern world. Sure, it’s hard to buy groceries or go out to the movies, but in my book there’s a lot to be said for the beauty of solitude.

(Besides, it’s not like you’d be totally isolated from society: you can shop on the Internet, watch TV online or movies from Netflix, and maintain a vast network of friends via social media. In fact, it’s a good bet this dude has his own Facebook page – and part of me wants to scan Twitter for names like @FortOrdTrailer or @MontereyShepherd to see what I find. On second thought, I probably won’t; it would be too discouraging to learn that he has more friends or followers than me.)

I’ve seen the shepherd several times in the midst of a my trail runs or bike rides, but never said anything more than “hi” or “good morning” as we’re both performing our selected tasks. The easy solution to my questions, of course, would be to just stop and pick his brain for a few minutes about job satisfaction and quality of life … but somehow I think if I actually found out, that would diminish my experience the next time I wander by.


Because half of the fun is in the wondering: whether I could live a life that’s so foreign to my own, whether I could be happy in a completely different set of circumstances, whether I could be anyone other than me. I suppose no one can ever know these things for sure, but they’re definitely interesting notions to think about when I’m making my early morning rounds.

*
I always waffle back and forth about whether I prefer DMB's music played with the full band, or in the more chilled-out acoustic settings he specializes in. More often than not, the decision is based on my mood - and today, you're getting acoustic. Either way, this one's a gem.

Dave Matthews, "Dancing Nancies" (click to play; the song gets started about 1 minute in):




Get updates as soon as they're posted! Click here to subscribe to Running and Rambling.
Check out the Running Life book for a collection of our most popular columns.

Read more...

April 16, 2011

Random Shots of Beauty (Bonus Edition!)

One reminder before our regularly scheduled programming: if you somehow missed it earlier in the week, be sure to check out my Merrell Barefoot Trail Glove review, and enter for your chance to win a free pair.

*
This weekend's RSOB comes from very familiar territory:

Sunrise over Fort Ord, in the early miles of a long midweek training run. These are the kind of scenes that are worth waking up early for.

But wait - that's not all! This weekend you're getting some bonus Random Shots of Beauty, courtesy of my two daughters and their elementary school art show that took place this week. The first one is from my 1st grader, who is enamored with sea otters and wants to become a marine biologist someday:

It's called An Otter in the Ocean; simple, straightforward, and pretty much what we'd expect from her.

Her older sister had similar aquatic theme:

Asked for the title, she replied, "Um ... it doesn't really have a name." So we'll just agree to call it Untitled.

*
One last administrative note: I'm off to Yosemite for a few days, and hoping to have a couple of posts robo-published here in my absence - but if for some reason there are technical difficulties, please stand by until we get officially rolling again at the end of the week.


Get updates as soon as they're posted! Click here to subscribe to Running and Rambling.
Check out the Running Life book for a collection of our most popular columns.

Read more...

April 14, 2011

Big Sur Marathon Out and Back Course; Running Life Book Discount

Around the Monterey Peninsula, as well as some regions of the Internet, it’s fairly common knowledge that my friend Mike and I write a running column for our local newspaper. And most people in these parts have at least a passing awareness that the Big Sur Marathon is right around the corner.

So when one of the major news stories in our community was the landslide that took out a section of Highway 1 – along with a sizeable chunk of the Big Sur Marathon course – last month, more than a few people wondered when we would write something about it for the newspaper. Obviously, the story was right up our alley, but we wanted to present a somewhat different angle than “Gee, this kinda sucks.”

Fortunately, we had some experience to draw upon: a similar situation 13 years ago, the only other time that the Big Sur Marathon course was changed, and a race in which Mike and I both happened to participate. We realized that our memories from that year weren’t particularly better or worse than other times we’ve run the race, and we decided to look for some objective comparisons that might draw similar conclusions. The result is the article that follows below: an analysis of the one previous “out and back” year compared to others, and a reassurance that this year’s participants will still have a great experience at our hometown race.

Before the article, one more note related to this year’s Big Sur Marathon: Mike and I will be at the race expo, signing copies of our book and selling them at a 20% discount. We decided to extend the discount offer to online customers as well – so between now and race day on May 1st, you can get a copy of our Running Life book at a reduced price from our website. Click here to go to our webpage, and remember to include instructions to us if you want signed copies or any other individual touches.

Or you can just click the photo ...


Running Life 4/7/11 “Out and Back”

As virtually everyone knows by now, a sizeable piece of Highway 1 is currently sitting in the Pacific Ocean. To runners, Highway 1 is better known as the Big Sur Marathon course – so when the announcement was made that the world-famous course would be altered, some portions of the running community went into a bit of a tizzy.

Take it from us: don’t worry about the Big Sur International Marathon. Everything will be fine.

First, let’s clarify something from a practical standpoint: there’s absolutely no way that the regular course could be used this year. Even if a makeshift road is in place by race day – an uncertain bet thanks to weather complications and inevitable construction delays – the road can’t possibly handle the nearly 200 buses that travel back and forth on race morning. Concern for runner safety has to be the top priority, and the race board made the right decision in changing the course for this year’s event on May 1st.

A similar natural disaster caused a re-routing in 1998, which marathon veterans lovingly call the “out and back” year. If you’re superstitious, it’s interesting to note that 1998 was the 13th presentation of the Big Sur Marathon and this year is the 26th. 1998 was also the first year Wally Kastner was Race Director and Dr. Hugo Ferlito was Chairman of the Board, presenting them with a significant trial by fire. Ferlito stepped down last year, but Kastner is still the RD, so the reroute isn’t uncharted territory for him.

We checked statistics from the out and back 1998 race and the regular course in 1999, which both enjoyed nearly perfect weather. The average men’s finishing time in 1998 was 4:08 and in 1999 was 4:09. The average woman’s finishing time was 4:27 in 1998 and 4:26 in 1999. It’s likely that the supposed “advantage” of not climbing the 2-mile grind up to Hurricane Point is compensated by running through the steeply rolling hills of Carmel Highlands twice. Course times were so similar that the men’s winner in 1998, Srba Nikolic, ran 2:21:36 and the following year ran 2:21:37 while finishing third behind winner Arsenio Ortiz’s 2:19:16.


The big difference in logistics is that in 1998 the course repairs were on Hurricane Point, south of Bixby Bridge, which allowed a full 13.1 miles of road from Carmel before the turnaround point. This year’s damage is north of Bixby, requiring an additional 1.75-mile detour through Point Lobos on the way back up the coast. This year’s runners will be the first ever to race through the breathtaking coastline of Point Lobos, which could provide a much-needed pick-me-up between miles 22 and 24.

Another difference from 1998 is what we’ll call the Facebook effect, which has proven to be something of a mixed blessing. When the course change was announced, runners took to posting hundreds of comments on the BSIM Facebook page. Some of the initial commenters were out of town participants who questioned whether the road was really unrunnable, or whether the race should offer refunds because runners couldn’t experience the Big Sur coastline or Hurricane Point. The anger and rudeness of some of them made us cringe, but each one was replied to professionally by the BSIM staff.

Fortunately, the majority of comments were sympathetic, encouraging, and upbeat, and it’s been great to see how most of the running community has resolved to make the best of a difficult situation and embrace this year’s race for the unique challenge it offers. We can assure them that nearly every aspect of the race will be as fantastic as they usually are.

Good luck to all the participants of this year’s Big Sur International Marathon; your accomplishment will still be just as significant, your feeling of satisfaction just as rewarding, and your experience just as beautiful as any other in the history of this wonderful race.



Get updates as soon as they're posted! Click here to subscribe to Running and Rambling.
Check out the Running Life book for a collection of our most popular columns.

Read more...

April 12, 2011

Merrell Barefoot Trail Glove Review and Giveaway

While I firmly believe that minimalist running is here to stay, I also think it will reach a settling point over the long term. I anticipate that many traditional runners will become convinced of the benefits of barefoot biomechanics, but will still want a marginal amount of comfort and protection from their everyday shoes. I also suspect that a percentage of current barefoot and minimalist diehards will eventually drift back – either for reasons of comfort or performance, or both – towards footwear that is something more than a flat slab of rubber and a little bit of leather.

Accordingly, there will be a huge demand for “nearly” barefoot shoes that are structured enough to appeal to wary traditionalists, but minimal enough to attract purists as well; basically, something that can bring minimalism to the mainstream consumer. And when that time comes, Merrell will be ready.

More than any other company this year, Merrell has completely thrown its arms around the barefoot and minimalist movement: from recognizing numerous biomechanics studies detailing the advantages of natural running, to educating its customers (largely through the efforts of barefoot advocate Jason Robillard) in proper barefoot technique, to supporting the minimalist community through a dedicated website and social media campaign, to creating a whole collection of footwear designed to appeal to the widest possible spectrum of folks interested in minimalism. This isn’t a “me, too” effort by a major company looking to cash in on the latest trend – it’s a genuine investment by an established industry player acknowledging that minimalist footwear is here to stay, and looking to establish itself as the dominant brand in bringing minimalism to the masses.

To my additional delight, they’ve also proven to be one of the most generous companies I’ve encountered – which is the perfect cue to announce two upcoming giveaways. After today’s review, we’ll have a contest for one pair of Merrell’s Men’s Trail Glove, which will be described shortly. A couple of weeks from now, I’ll post a review of their Women’s Pace Glove, and give away one pair of those as well. But if you’re still not a fan of the company after what I’ve just described, allow me to introduce you to the Trail Glove, which makes a strong case as one of the best minimalist trail shoes on the market today.


Merrell Barefoot Trail Glove


As usual, we’ll consider the vital specs first: the Trail Glove weighs in at 6.2 oz, with a midsole height of 12mm at both heel and forefoot. Thus, it’s a very lightweight zero-drop shoe that places you slightly higher off the ground than a pair of Vibrams (8mm for the KSO Trek), but lower and flatter than New Balance’s Minimus Trail (15mm heel/11mm forefoot). It has some protective features of traditional shoes without sacrificing any of the flexibility or mechanics of barefoot running.


Mesh upper; Omni-fit lacing with straps across tongue; laces also attached to side TPU overlays

Material construction of the upper is a somewhat traditional microfiber and air mesh design, with a rubberized bumper at the front for abrasion and impact resistance. Through the midfoot, synthetic overlays are looped into the lacing system, creating a very snug midfoot and forefoot feel. I found the uppers to be extremely effective at draining and drying after water immersions, but still warm enough to keep your toes happy when air temperatures get frosty. The toe box is wide enough to prevent hot spots and to allow your toes to splay without impingement. There’s a slight upward curvature to the toebox, but when they’re actually on my feet I found this to be unnoticeable.


Upward curvature of toebox; yellow TPU overlays

The overall shape of the upper is cut to be snug through the metatarsal area, to the point where it’s sometimes hard for me to get my foot into the shoe (more on this in a second). It accomplishes a similar feel as the forefoot of New Balance’s Minimus Trail, without having an actual strap across the top of the foot. Merrell’s Omni-fit lacing system incorporates not just the TPU overlays on the side of the shoe, but small straps across the tongue as well, so that tension is applied evenly across the entire upper when the laces are tightened.


Thin ankle collar

Since the Trail Glove is designed to be worn without socks, its ankle collar is very thin and sits snug around the heel, with an interior sockliner that is quite plush and comfortable against your skin. The antimicrobial microfiber footbed below has a somewhat rubbery feel to it, which further minimizes any slipping of the foot. If you're keeping track, that's about 5 different structural mechanisms to keep your foot stable and secure on top of the midsole, resulting in an overall feel like the shoe is simply an extension of your foot. Whether you’re on irregular terrain or steep downhills, your foot isn’t going anywhere it shouldn’t be inside this shoe.


Microfiber footbed; soft internal sockliner

One caveat to the whole sockless fit concept is that the upper is almost too snug to wear with traditional trail running socks. I’m not a fan of going sockless, especially on high-mileage days, so I wear socks for most of my longer runs in these shoes – but I find that even when wearing my thinnest socks (Drymax Lite Trail), I have to kind of wriggle my foot into the upper when putting the Trail Gloves on. Once I’m in, I’m good to go … but I’ve learned to budget for an extra 30 seconds or so when getting dressed in the morning. Fortunately, it’s a compromise I can live with.


Rear view: stability overlay strap, EVA midsole above rubber outsole

With most natural running shoes, there’s a performance tradeoff through the midsole area; true minimalist fans want their footwear to be as flexible as possible, which inherently limits the possibility of incorporating any protective features. And if there’s any midsole at all (for purists, none is preferable), it should be as thin as possible to maintain maximal ground feel against the bottom of the foot. This is where Merrell has staked out a nice middle ground, by incorporating two design elements that add a dose of comfort while not detracting too significantly from overall barefoot feel.

The first element isn’t anything novel: it’s a 4mm compression-molded EVA layer between the outsole and insole. This thickness is similar to Vibram’s Trek midsole – and just as with the FiveFingers, I’ve also noticed that there’s a settling period during the first 100 miles or so of use. In other words, the initial “cushy” feeling eventually recedes to allow improved ground feel than you have on your first run out of the box.


Great flexibility, along with great protection

It’s in the forefoot area that Merrell offers a cool innovation: a 1mm forefoot plate that distributes impact pressure from sharp rocks, but is still completely flexible. This combination of slight cushioning and slight impact protection makes the Trail Glove somewhat unique in the spectrum of minimalist trail shoes. From my testing, its ground feel is slightly less than Vibram’s Trek or Terra Plana’s Evo, but there’s a little more comfort over exceedingly long runs or rugged terrain. Compared to New Balance’s Minimus, the Trail Glove has a similar level of comfort, with slightly better ground feel. Granted, we’re talking about differences of millimeters one way or the other – but if you’re a longtime minimalist runner, you notice these things.


Vibram rubber outsole

For the outsole, Merrell turned to the most prominent name in performance footwear. The Trail Glove features Vibram TC-1 rubber that is cut with moderate “knobbing” throughout and ridges across the front end. Like a pair of FiveFingers, it’s contoured very closely through the arch area and narrow through the midfoot. Durability of the outsole has been excellent after about 150 miles, and traction has been great in a variety of conditions (with a couple of exceptions below), especially on wet surfaces. I’ve worn my Trail Gloves for a handful of knee-deep stream crossings, and I was pleasantly surprised at how secure my footing was on the round, slick rocks beneath the surface. They also remain quite stable in mud, and grip nicely around irregular surfaces like rocks and roots.

The only drawback to the outsole I’ve experienced is some minor slipping on loose gravel on steep hills. Going up, the knobs and ridges don’t grab the dirt, occasionally just pushing it backwards a bit. On steep descents, I’ve had a little bit of sliding on top of the dirt, especially if I’ve run through some wet conditions already and have some lingering mud caked into the lugs. This particular problem isn’t uncommon with other shoes, and I’d rank the Trail Glove outsole slightly ahead of the Vibram Trek or Terra Plana Evo, but slightly behind the New Balance Minimus in this regard.

Overall, Merrell has done an outstanding job of incorporating nearly all the elements of barefoot mechanics while offering a compelling option for traditional runners who are reluctant to go “all the way” to pure minimalist footwear. In an increasingly crowded field, the Trail Glove is a true standout that’s equally suited for ultramarathons or light recreational use. It’s clear that Merrell did their homework in developing this shoe, which isn’t too surprising in light of their extended commitment that I described at the beginning of the post. If their goal is to make minimalism accessible and enjoyable for the masses, the Trail Glove should be considered an enormous success.


Merrell’s Trail Glove retails for $110 from TravelCountry.com as well as other online vendors – but in conjunction with this review, one lucky reader will get a pair for free. My usual “big” contest rules apply here: we’ll do a weighted entry system, with additional entries for links to this post from your blog and/or Facebook page (remember, I double-check sometimes). Leave a comment below for a single entry, and let me know how many additional tickets you’ve earned, for a possibility of up to three total entries. Remember, this is a men’s shoe only – so ladies, you’re entering for your brothers or husbands on this one (which is fine with me), and your own contest will take place later this month.

The winner will be announced on Saturday, April 23rd. Good luck to everybody, and thanks very much to Merrell for sponsoring such an awesome giveaway!

*Product provided by Merrell
**See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you’d like reviewed, contact me at info@runningandrambling.com.



Get updates as soon as they're posted! Click here to subscribe to Running and Rambling.
Check out the Running Life book for a collection of our most popular columns.

Read more...

April 9, 2011

Soft Star RunAmoc Dash Preview; Soft Star Survey Request

I’ve let slip in a couple of previous posts that I’ve been doing some prototype testing for Soft Star this year in preparation for a new shoe that will be released later this spring. Truth be told, the company is developing two new products – and since they just officially introduced one of those models at the end of last week, I figure that gives me license to talk about it a little bit.

This May, Soft Star is releasing a new version of their remarkably popular RunAmoc, which has been my favorite minimalist shoe ever since its debut approximately one year ago. You might think that since I loved the first version so much, the prospect of a new and improved model would have me giddy with excitement … but if you did, you’d be flat out wrong.

In fact, participating in this development process was somewhat distressing at times, partially attributable to the fact that I love the original RunAmoc so much. I didn’t want my favorite shoe to be replaced, and the first models I tested were more than a little bit disappointing. Soft Star made a lot of changes to the original … and I honestly hated almost every single one of them.

To their credit, though, the elves at Soft Star were open to just about every piece of feedback I offered, and graciously hand crafted one pair after another to incorporate little changes here and there as we went along. As of right now, I’ve tested no fewer than 7 different pairs of moccasins so far – and I’m not certain that we’re completely done yet.

Consequently, I’m going to wait on posting an official review until the final version - which has a working name of Dash - becomes available on the company website. For today, I thought it might be interesting to show a sampling of where we’ve been – because like I said, it’s been kind of a strange ride. For example:


The first version I tested looked nothing like any Soft Star shoe I had ever seen. The colors were weird, the styling was odd, the construction was problematic, and the fit was relatively poor in a couple of key areas. Have I mentioned that I wasn’t exactly wild about the new RunAmoc? Fortunately, this version quickly gave way to a prototype that at least looked something like its predecessor …


… except that it had laces, which is one of the primary design changes on the new RunAmoc this year. The laces are great for improving the forefoot fit …


… but there was still a lot of modification at the heel over several versions. Initially there wasn’t a heel support cup, and then there were two different styles … and I actually don’t know what the final call on this will be. And this is only half of the heel puzzle …


… as the cut of the heel collar is quite a bit different on this version than the original RunAmoc. It has a high notch at the Achilles area, and tapers downward around the ankle bones on each side. Without the laces that wrap around the heel in the original RunAmocs, a secure fit through the heel has been one of my biggest concerns.


Original RunAmoc on top; first new version on bottom

The toe box shape has also undergone a few variations, and I’m not sure what dimensions will be settled upon for the final version. Although the picture above doesn’t reflect it, the new version is currently running a little bit narrower and a little more rounded than the original, but should still allow plenty of room for natural toe movement.

I’d like to say that the end result of all this is a product that completely blows me away – but truthfully, I’m still not 100% convinced that this new version is an improvement over the original. However, over the course of multiple changes, the new RunAmoc has gradually evolved into something that I’m confident enough to run an ultra in … which is exactly what I did at Woodside a few weeks ago, after which point we went back to the drawing board to address a couple more issues.


53 muddy miles in new RunAmocs

The best news in this whole story is that the original RunAmoc and RunAmoc Lites that I love so much aren’t going anywhere; they’ll still be available on the Soft Star website even as the new version is released, to accommodate folks like me who aren’t quite ready to say goodbye to the moccasin we’ve fallen in love with. Before the new ones are released, Soft Star is soliciting feedback on the stock color they’ll offer; go to their company blog or Facebook page to tell them whether you prefer silver or black.


In the meantime, I’m continuing to test the new RunAmoc as well as the other model to be announced later; my hope is that by the time summer rolls around, I’ll be able to say that one of these new offerings is something truly special.




Get updates as soon as they're posted! Click here to subscribe to Running and Rambling.
Check out the Running Life book for a collection of our most popular columns.

Read more...

Random Shots of Beauty

This week's RSOB wasn't taken from a trail run; truthfully, it wasn't even taken by me. Rather, it's a view of a place that's been on my mind quite often over the past few days:

Yosemite Valley, as seen from the park's Ahwahnee Meadow webcam this morning. We have a family trip planned for later this month, but with the recent threat of a government shutdown, for a while there our chances looked pretty bleak. Needless to say, we're glad that Congress worked things out at least well enough to keep our favorite national park open.

Now if someone could just do something about all that snow ...



Get updates as soon as they're posted! Click here to subscribe to Running and Rambling.
Check out the Running Life book for a collection of our most popular columns.

Read more...

April 7, 2011

GoLite Tara Lite Running Shoe Review

Have you ever had one of those experiences where you feel like you get to know somebody from a distance – either through e-mails, a webpage, watching them on TV, and so on – before finally meeting them in person, and realizing that they actually look quite different than you had pictured in your head? This spring, some shoe reviewers had just such an experience upon meeting GoLite Footwear's Tara Lite running shoe. And yes, I was one of them.

When the shoes were first announced back in the fall, press releases described them as taking the best aspects of classic huarache sandals, and adding some protection and traction while still allowing the foot to function naturally. And the name of the shoe is a short for Tarahumara – as in the Tarahumara Indians, whom legions of Born to Run fans now recognize as the patron saints of minimalist running.


GoLite also did a well-received advertising campaign in the buildup to the shoe’s release, placing ads in Trail Runner and other magazines with the slogan “Run Natural. Run Wild”. So a certain type of image began forming in people’s minds: huarache, Tarahumara, natural running ... and the easy conclusion was that the Tara Lite would be a cool new minimalist shoe.

Well, we were half-right, because the Tara is a fairly cool shoe - but with specs of 11oz and a 24mm midsole, it’s anything but minimalist. And my initial impression of, “Wow – that looks a lot different than I expected” was shared by others, with some prompt backlash from a few testers who had hoped it was going to be something altogether different.

Truthfully, we probably should have just paid closer attention, because one word that GoLite never used throughout its marketing (trust me, I went back and checked) was "minimal". Rather, the Tara is part of the company’s BareTech series, which aims to achieve a balance between minimalist footwear and traditional trail running shoes. It is designed for runners who want to adjust their biomechanics but aren’t ready to make a complete shift to minimal shoes, and delivers what the company describes as a “natural ride with full protection”.


GoLite Tara Lite

Understanding all that, and setting aside my disappointment that this wasn’t a minimalist offering, the Tara was still an interesting shoe to review. It has several design innovations, some of which work, and some of which seem more clever than truly practical. And it has one element that’s perhaps the best of any shoe I’ve tested – but for that, you have to keep reading.


Many of the innovations are noticeable right off the bat, in that the Tara looks nothing like your traditional running shoe – instead, it looks like a hybrid of a moccasin and a sandal. The upper isn’t a mesh fabric, but a stretchy synthetic “second skin” that feels comfortable and is excellent at keeping grit out, but also runs a little warmer than traditional ventilated uppers. Crossing on top of the upper is an adjustable fit strap system that takes the place of standard laces, and works something like the strap system on Vibram KSOs. This is a creative design, but I wouldn’t call it a home run; when I tighten the straps, I notice an improved fit across the top of the foot, but not always down the length of the midfoot like you do with laces.


The front of the strap passes through the little hole in the top of the upper and is anchored into the midsole as a thong post like you have in a pair of flip-flops or with traditional huaraches. The performance advantage of having this post is that it serves as a forward motion block on steep downhills to prevent your toes from sliding to the front of the toebox. However, it causes one significant practical adjustment: you can’t wear standard socks with the Tara Lite, unless you want to scrunch the material between your 1st and 2nd toes down enough to wrap around the post.


To accommodate for this, GoLite provides one free pair of notched socks that are perfect for use in the Tara, although I suspect that most people will just use Injinji socks. If you don’t happen to have several pairs of Injinjis stockpiled, you might have a hard time making the Tara your everyday shoe. Some folks will probably go sockless, and the second skin upper feels fairly comfortable against bare skin, but I usually prefer to wear socks (regardless of what shoes I’m using) when I’m logging high mileage on the trail.


A similar strap mechanism is located behind the heel to adjust the fit of the ankle opening. Between the ankle strap and the forefoot system, there are a lot of possibilities for customizing your fit, so I’d be surprised to hear if anyone has a hard time making the shoe feel secure around his foot. However, this degree of adjustment and customization takes a bit of trial and error to find the various tensions that work the best.

There’s also some degree of customization with the insole system that GoLite uses for its running shoes: the insoles can be thickened, thinned out, left neutral, or removed completely, resulting in various degrees of toebox height and width. The toebox is naturally roomy even with the standard insole; in fact, I’d suggest that the shoes run slightly large, as my regular size 11 felt noticeably more roomy than the same size in other brands.


Last fall, GoLite was a groundbreaker in introducing zero-drop midsoles in its Amp Lite men’s shoe and Micro Lite women’s shoe. A similar midsole is used for the Tara, which is 24mm thick at both heel and forefoot, and it uses the same Soft Against the Ground (SATG) technology employed in those other two models. SATG quite literally turns conventional shoe construction upside down, with the softest material closest to the ground, and a firmer platform under your foot. GoLite claims that this technology decreases ground impact and reduces rear foot movement by up to 33%; the impact claim is a hard one for me to qualify, since any shoe with a midsole is going to feel excessively spongy, but I can attest that the rear foot area is quite stable.

There’s also one major drawback of the thick EVA midsole that’s best explained by demonstration …


You know how I usually include pictures of a rolled-up shoe when I’m reviewing minimalist footwear? Well, this is as close as I could get with the Tara. In the above picture, I’m pushing down as hard as I can – and the midsole is barely budging. So if you’re looking for flexibility, this obviously isn’t the shoe for you.


Finally, here’s the overwhelming strength of the Tara Lite: its sticky gecko outsole that is perhaps the most grippy, stable, and versatile outsole I’ve ever tested on a trail shoe. Yes, it’s that good. It’s inspired by the setae (that’s a frequent spelling bee word, by the way) on a gecko’s feet, and is composed of over 350 lugs of various sizes, effectively creating an enormous amount of surface area for the rubber to grab the trail.

I found the outsole to perform exceptionally well in all sorts of conditions, from rocks and loose gravel to rain and mud and river crossings to snow (yes, really) and slush. However, when I was testing the outsole in wet conditions, another quirk of the Tara came to light: water seeps in through the thong post hole on top of the upper, but doesn’t evaporate very efficiently through the second skin material. Therefore, even though the outsole is designed for the most demanding conditions, you may have some discomfort in other parts of the shoe to make you think twice about taking them on.

Clearly, the Tara is something of a mixed bag, with some very cool innovations alongside some features that sort of miss the mark from a performance standpoint. It’s far too high and too heavy to be an everyday shoe for me, but there’s definitely a lot of potential for future development.

Throughout the time I was testing them, I couldn’t help but ponder what my ideal GoLite shoe would be: a thin, breathable mesh upper with a strap fastening system that doesn’t use a thong post, affixed directly on top of the gecko outsole, resulting in a low, lightweight, flexible minimalist shoe that can handle any trail challenges imaginable. Perhaps a shoe like that is coming one day; in the meantime, the Tara presents an interesting option for runners who like classic shoe structure but want to incorporate some elements of natural biomechanics when taking on the trail. Zero drop shoes are becoming fairly well-established, and for a certain cross-section of runners, that may be as close to natural biomechanics as they ever want to get.

GoLite's Tara Lite retails for $115 from Amazon.com as well as other online vendors.


*Product provided by GoLite Footwear
**See other product reviews on sidebar at right. If you have a product you’d like reviewed, contact me at info@runningandrambling.com.





Get updates as soon as they're posted! Click here to subscribe to Running and Rambling.
Check out the Running Life book for a collection of our most popular columns.

Read more...
Related Posts with Thumbnails

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP